The passage explains about the concept of 24/7 international working day and describes its benefits. The professor undermines the passage claim by referring to a personal experience to show the disadvantages of such concept.
First of all, the professor indicates that when separated teams are working in a 24/7 international day pattern, the time difference does not allow the teams to get synchronized with each other in case of having any unclear situation. For example, if a team has uncertainity about how to perform a task it cannot communicate with its collaborator in the other part of the world immediately. Thus, the team members should continue the work based on their assumptions. This refutes the passage claim that international working day is an efficient strategy which has diminished the problems regarding to physical separation.
Secondly, the professor contends that coordinating the two separate groups which are working within different time zones is time consuming and leads to some unpredicted expenditures of personal effort as well as financial resource. This undermines the passage claim that believes 27/7 work scheme effectively reduces the time frame for delivering a project as well as the expences.
Finally, the professor underlines the difficulties associated with holding a tele-conference as the two teams on opposing time zone hardly can manage to set a time that both groups of people are not in bed. Actually, one team should stay at work until late afternoon and the other should wake up very early at the morning. This is not in agreement with the passage that says tele-communication allows teams to have immediate access to each other and communicate in an efficient and cost-effective system.
The
passage
explains
about the concept of 24/7 international
working
day and
describes
its benefits. The
professor
undermines the
passage
claim by referring to a personal experience to
show
the disadvantages of such concept.
First of all
, the
professor
indicates that when separated
teams
are
working
in a 24/7 international day pattern, the
time
difference does not
allow
the
teams
to
get
synchronized with each
other
in case of having any unclear situation.
For example
, if a
team
has
uncertainity
about how to perform a task it cannot communicate with its collaborator in the
other
part of the world immediately.
Thus
, the
team
members should continue the work based on their assumptions. This refutes the
passage
claim that international
working
day is an efficient strategy which has diminished the problems
regarding to
physical separation.
Secondly
, the
professor
contends that coordinating the two separate groups which are
working
within
different
time
zones is
time consuming
and leads to
some
unpredicted
expenditures of personal effort
as well
as financial resource. This undermines the
passage
claim that believes 27/7 work scheme
effectively
reduces
the
time
frame for delivering a project
as well
as the
expences
.
Finally
, the
professor
underlines the difficulties associated with holding a
tele-conference
as the two
teams
on opposing
time
zone hardly can manage to set a
time
that both groups of
people
are not in bed. Actually, one
team
should stay at work until late afternoon and the
other
should wake up
very
early
at the morning
. This is not in agreement with the
passage
that says
tele-communication
allows
teams
to have immediate access to each
other
and communicate in an efficient and cost-effective system.