The reading passage talks about few solution that should be adopted by the poor country in order to help their population to buy necessary medication to treat AIDS. However, the professor explain that those solutions are not feasible and refutes each of the author's reason.
First, the article states that the profit of the pharmaceutical companies which sell the Aids drug are too high and they cannot be afforded by the patients. The professor refutes this reason by stating that the pharmaceutical companies function as any other business, . If they wouldn't make a profit, there will not be investitors, money and hence no new drugs can be developed.
Second, the article claims that governments should buy the drags because they will get a lower price by purchasing large quantities. However, the professor argue this point by saying that the governments in poor countries are poor too. They will not have money to spent on the huge amounts of AIDS drugs.
Third, the reading passage avers that the poor countries should be encouraged to make their own cheap version of the drug even though this is a felony. The lecturer opposes this argument saying that this is considered a stilling. Moreover, the manufacturers in poor countries will not have money to produce their drugs in a proper way. They might use tainted chemicals and do not perform the quality control tests on the drugs in order to produce the cheap version of the medication. These, instead of helping people might kill them.
The reading passage talks about
few solution
that should
be adopted
by the
poor
country
in order to
help
their population to
buy
necessary medication to treat AIDS.
However
, the professor
explain
that those solutions are not feasible and refutes each of the author's reason.
First
, the article states that the profit of the pharmaceutical
companies
which sell the Aids
drug
are too
high and
they cannot
be afforded
by the patients. The professor refutes this reason by stating that the pharmaceutical
companies
function as any other business
, .
If they wouldn't
make
a profit, there will not be
investitors
, money and
hence
no new
drugs
can
be developed
.
Second, the article claims that
governments
should
buy
the drags
because
they will
get
a lower price by purchasing large quantities.
However
, the professor argue this point by saying that the
governments
in
poor
countries
are
poor
too. They will not have money to spent on the huge amounts of AIDS drugs.
Third, the reading passage avers that the
poor
countries
should
be encouraged
to
make
their
own
cheap
version of the
drug
even though
this is a felony. The lecturer opposes this argument saying that this
is considered
a stilling.
Moreover
, the manufacturers in
poor
countries
will not have money to produce their
drugs
in a proper way
. They might
use
tainted chemicals and do not perform the quality control
tests
on the
drugs
in order to produce the
cheap
version of the medication. These,
instead
of helping
people
might kill them.