The article states that Michelangelo is considered the greatest artist from the renaissance period and provides three reasons for that. However, the professor explains that and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading claims that renaissance period in art produced the best art pieces of the humanity. Michelangelo is declared by the reading passage as being the most famous artist of this era who had spent 4 years working to the Statue of David. This statues is considered a magnificent piece of art. The professor refutes this point by saying that there were another artists who had been recognized as being talented and famous, such as Rafael and Leonardo Davinci. He states that Michelangelo didn’t create the statue from scratch, but he had finished the work of another artist who left the statue unfinished, therefore he doesn’t owns the complete pattern for this statue.
Second, the article posits that Michelangelo also had been worked over 40 years to paint the Sistine Chapel. However, the professor says that this idea is not very accurate because such a big amount of work could have not be done by a single person. According to the professor, Michelangelo should had hired people to work for him in order to complete the Sistine Chapel.
Third, the reading claims that during this period, Michelangelo completed other opera too, such as Statue of Moses, the painting of the Twelve Apostles and the Last Judgment. The professor opposes this point by explaining that the artist needed to have helpers to do all these things. The professor states that Michelangelo might be considered a great manager of other talents.
The article states that Michelangelo
is considered
the greatest
artist
from the renaissance period and provides three reasons for that.
However
, the
professor
explains
that and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First
, the reading claims that renaissance period in art produced the best art pieces of the humanity. Michelangelo
is declared
by the reading passage as being the most
famous
artist
of this era who had spent 4 years working to the
Statue
of David.
This
statues
is
considered a magnificent piece of art. The
professor
refutes this point by saying that there were another
artists
who had
been recognized
as
being talented
and
famous
, such as Rafael and Leonardo
Davinci
. He states that Michelangelo didn’t create the
statue
from scratch,
but
he had finished the work of another
artist
who
left
the
statue
unfinished,
therefore
he doesn’t
owns
the complete pattern for this statue.
Second, the article posits that Michelangelo
also
had
been worked
over 40 years to paint the Sistine Chapel.
However
, the
professor
says that this
idea
is not
very
accurate
because
such a
big
amount of work could have not
be
done by a single person. According to the
professor
, Michelangelo should
had
hired
people
to work for him in order to complete the Sistine Chapel.
Third, the reading claims that during this period, Michelangelo completed other opera too, such as
Statue
of Moses, the painting of the Twelve Apostles and the Last Judgment. The
professor
opposes this point by explaining that the
artist
needed to have helpers to do all these things. The
professor
states that Michelangelo might
be considered
a great manager of other talents.