Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In this set of materials the article posits that developing of fossils trading among private owner ships is a critical event that suffers scientists and the general public.

In this set of materials the article posits that developing of fossils trading among private owner ships is a critical event that suffers scientists and the general public. ljxBW
In this set of materials the article posits that developing of fossils trading among private owner ships is a critical event that suffers scientists and the general public. In this regard it provides three reason of support. Conversely, the lecturer raises questions on the ideas and presents some evidence to refute them all. First of all, the author of the reading passage states that these private owners wouldn't let the public to see the fossils, which leads to a difficult situation for people to observe these fossils. On the contrast, the professor refutes this point by saying that any school and university can buy these fossils and by this way more fossils will be available to public. She mentioned that although buying the fossils privately has some negative points, its advantages outweigh the disadvantages. The next explanation that is uttered in the article is that scientists will lose a great source for their investigations if they can't have access to these fossils. In the contrast, the lecturer explains that scientists will not lose anything about these fossils, not even one of them. According to the professor only scientists can identify the fossils and private owners must ask them to recognize these materials for them. So, they can have access to all the fossils which private collectors would buy. The last reason that is mentioned in the article is that many fossils and other evidence with them will be destroyed due to basic knowledge of the commercial fossil collectors about fossil unearthing. However, the speaker states that even though this process will damage some fossils, more fossils and evidence can be found by collectors. The professor claims that it is not necessary to unearth all the fossils.
In this set of materials the article posits that developing of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
trading among
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
owner ships is a critical
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
event
that suffers
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientists
and the
Consider using "public".
general public
. In this regard it provides three reason of support.
Conversely
, the lecturer raises questions on the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
ideas
and presents
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
evidence to refute them all.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".
First of all
, the author of the reading passage states that these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
owners wouldn't
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
let
the public to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
, which leads to a difficult situation for
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
to observe these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
. On the contrast, the professor refutes this point by saying that any school and university can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
buy
these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
and by this way more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
will be available to public. She mentioned that although buying the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
privately
has
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
points, its advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

The
next
explanation that
is uttered
in the article is that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientists
will lose a great source for their investigations if they can't have access to these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
. In the contrast, the lecturer
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explains
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientists
will not lose anything about these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
, not even one of them. According to the professor
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientists
can identify the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
owners
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
ask them to recognize these materials for them.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, they can have access to all the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
which
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
collectors would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
buy
.

The last reason that
is mentioned
in the article is that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
and other evidence with them will be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
destroyed
due to basic knowledge of the commercial
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossil
collectors about
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossil
unearthing.
However
, the speaker states that
even though
this process will damage
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
, more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
and evidence can
be found
by collectors. The professor claims that it is not necessary to unearth all the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossils
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay In this set of materials the article posits that developing of fossils trading among private owner ships is a critical event that suffers scientists and the general public.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
286 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • In this set of materials the article posits that developing of fossils trading among private owner ships is a critical event that suffers scientists and the general public.