The written exam was the only possible evaluation method in the past and thanks to the technological advancements for numerous other techniques to assess a student's academic performance nowadays. It is quite obvious that schools and other educational and training institutions are opting for a combination of different assessment methods and this shift has both advantages and demerits, which I shall examine in this essay.
To start with the advantages, practical approaches to evaluating students not only consider the overall learning and understanding of a student but also the accuracy and depth of their knowledge. For instance, in a paper based exam, a student can easily memorise the answers and perform well in written test; but when he is asked to demonstrate the knowledge his knowledge in a lab, his memorise-and-answer ability would help him a little. In practical exams, students who have really learned the lessons would pass with flying colours. Furthermore, assessment methods like interviews, group assignments, presentations and lab experiments prepare pupil to face the challenges in professional life.
Turning to the disadvantages of practical assessment, many students can cheat the evaluation process and pass the exam with a little devotion to study. For instance, a recent survey conducted on students in five different colleges revealed that students prefer group assignments, online presentations and lab experiments than written exam as they need to study more for the later one. On top of that, sometimes, teachers favour particular students and mark some students poorly due to personal reasons and the authority has little to do to reassess this marking scheme at a later date.
To conclude, genuine assessment of a student is quite an essential task for the schools and a combination of evaluation process should be implemented. Practical assessment offers many benefits and subsequently prepare students for the future challenges in both academic and professional environment
The written exam was the
only
possible evaluation method in the past and thanks to the technological advancements for numerous other techniques to assess a student's academic performance nowadays. It is quite obvious that schools and other educational and training institutions are opting for a combination of
different
assessment
methods and this shift has both advantages and demerits, which I shall examine in this essay.
To
start
with the advantages,
practical
approaches to evaluating
students
not
only
consider the
overall
learning and understanding of a
student
but
also
the accuracy and depth of their knowledge.
For instance
, in a paper based exam, a
student
can
easily
memorise
the answers and perform well in written
test
;
but
when he
is asked
to demonstrate the knowledge his knowledge in a lab, his
memorise-and-answer
ability would
help
him a
little
. In
practical
exams,
students
who have
really
learned the lessons would pass with flying
colours
.
Furthermore
,
assessment
methods like interviews, group assignments, presentations and lab experiments prepare pupil to face the challenges in professional life.
Turning to the disadvantages of
practical
assessment
,
many
students
can cheat the evaluation process and pass the exam with a
little
devotion to study.
For instance
, a recent survey conducted on
students
in five
different
colleges revealed that
students
prefer group assignments, online presentations and lab experiments than written exam as they need to study more for the later one.
On top of that
,
sometimes
, teachers
favour
particular
students
and mark
some
students
poorly
due to personal reasons and the authority has
little
to do to reassess this marking scheme at a later date.
To conclude
, genuine
assessment
of a
student
is quite an essential task for the schools and a combination of evaluation process should
be implemented
.
Practical
assessment
offers
many
benefits and
subsequently
prepare
students
for the future challenges in both academic and professional
environment