It is undeniable that reading sources such as books, newspapers, magazines, etc. have become commonly available online at no cost. However, does this mean that people will be able to read everything via the Internet for free? In this essay, I will argue that while ebooks can be fast and convenient, they are no substitutes for physical books.
Compared to the past, books have become far more accessible online, often for free. For example, certain books are available free of charge merely by googling, and able to be downloaded on tablets at times. Due to this, more people started preferring reading through their electronic devices to physical copies of books. Furthermore, e-books tend to be updated in an easy method, which typically only requires online editing, unlike how physical books are bound to need relatively more time-consuming update processes.
On the other hand, if the usage of reading resources online becomes so prevalent that it ends up fully overtaking paperbacks, it surely will cause a number of substantial negative effects. To illustrate, consider too many books being released online, possibly by someone who had bought a number of books themselves. This will often lead the book publishing industry to collapse as it will struggle to get paid for their works. Consequently, it can be considered against the law to pirate books through the Internet and enable anyone to read them without paying. Moreover, whereas electronic devices often have other applications installed on them, physical books don’t. This can mean that printed books are more effective in concentrating while reading than digital books are.
In conclusion, I strongly disagree that people will no longer purchase physical books in the future. Although it is true that digital versions of books or magazines allow us to access books easily, I certainly believe that we all have to pay for things and not everything is free in this world. 
It is undeniable that  
reading
 sources such as  
books
, newspapers, magazines, etc. have become  
commonly
 available  
online
 at no cost.  
However
, does this mean that  
people
 will be able to read everything via the Internet for  
free
? In this essay, I will argue that while  
ebooks
 can be  
fast
 and convenient, they are no substitutes for  
physical
 books.
Compared to the past,  
books
 have become far more accessible  
online
,  
often
 for  
free
.  
For example
, certain  
books
 are available  
free
 of charge  
merely
 by googling, and able to  
be downloaded
 on tablets at times. Due to this, more  
people
  started
 preferring  
reading
 through their electronic devices to  
physical
 copies of  
books
.  
Furthermore
, e-books tend to  
be updated
 in an easy method, which  
typically
  only
 requires  
online
 editing, unlike how  
physical
  books
  are bound
 to need  
relatively
 more time-consuming update processes. 
On the other hand
, if the usage of  
reading
 resources  
online
 becomes  
so
 prevalent that it ends up  
fully
 overtaking paperbacks, it  
surely
 will cause a number of substantial  
negative
 effects. To illustrate, consider too  
many
  books
  being released
  online
,  
possibly
 by someone who had  
bought
 a number of  
books
 themselves. This will  
often
 lead the  
book
 publishing industry to collapse as it will struggle to  
get
 paid for their works.  
Consequently
, it can  
be considered
 against the law to pirate  
books
 through the Internet and enable anyone to read them without paying.  
Moreover
, whereas electronic devices  
often
 have other applications installed on them,  
physical
  books
 don’t. This can mean that printed  
books
 are more effective in concentrating while  
reading
 than digital  
books
 are. 
In conclusion
, I  
strongly
 disagree that  
people
 will no longer  
purchase
  physical
  books
 in the future. Although it is true that digital versions of  
books
 or magazines  
allow
 us to access  
books
  easily
, I  
certainly
 believe that we all  
have to
 pay for things and not everything is  
free
 in this world.