Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In some countries students pay college fees and University fees themselves but in others it is paid by others. Do the advantages of government money outweigh the disadvantage?

In some countries students pay college fees and University fees themselves but in others it is paid by others. Do the advantages of government money outweigh the disadvantage? e0xW
Undoubtedly, regime should managing fund to expand on education system to cut literacy rates. However, a few numbers of nations there colleges and universities charges filled by learners where in remaining nations authorities paying these fees. The pros of governing wealth like beneficial for poor students and organise campus to educate people about higher education overshadow cons such as difficult to finance budgets and not care on other areas. The main benefit of government money paid in a form of colleges and universities fees is that international students who come from poor countries into develop nations to take higher studies as well as a little amount of students is those who are very wise and bright in education but not able to pay charges of higher education centres so it is helpful for them because government providing them scholarships. In addition to this, in some nations a few people is suffering from poverty as well as not eligible to pay colleges and universities fees of their offsprings so in that case it is responsibility of authorities to give aid to them as they are citizens of those countries. For example, in Canada a native learners who are poor but better in education so Canadian regime give scholarships to them for continuing their studies and offer scholarships to foreign students. The another major advantage is that government can use money to organising campaigns to motivate students to take higher education because learners are the future of nations. Furthermore, some parents are not be able to fill the charges of colleges and universities of their offspring so that it why they stop sending their children into higher education centres and these camps help to in courage those guardians to send their children into colleges. Even though, educational campaigns are necessary for lazy masses to educate them about studies as they negligible to go in colleges and universities. For instance, in India there are some areas who are living under poverty and their offspring is not going into higher education centres so that is why a majority of members who hired by regime visit there and give tuition classes to learners and motivate them to take higher education. Nevertheless, the main on phase of this notion is that if authorities will spend a vast amount of money on upgrading education services and neglect other areas than it is perilous for government to keep up their budgets. Moreover, there are lots of concern areas like health care, job sectors and etcetera who also demanding funds from regime of their enhancement as they are crucial for government to providing income. Apart from this, if regime will pay fess of poor students than other progenitors will be felt that authorities will show differences with them. For example, in China regime announced that they should pay charges of poorer learners of Colleges and universities but some parents who are eligible for paying fees start doing protests because they think that authorities see disparities between them. In conclusion, although it is good for learners who lives under poverty paid their higher education centres fees by authorities but if regime will pay huge money on education system than it is stressful for others such as health, public transport, job sectors and so on.
Undoubtedly
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regime
should
The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: "manage"
managing
fund to expand on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
education
system to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
cut
literacy rates.
However
, a few numbers of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
there colleges and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
universities
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
charges
filled by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
learners
where in remaining
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
authorities
paying these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fees
. The pros of governing wealth like beneficial for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
and
Possible spelling mistake. 'organise' is British English.
organise
campus to educate
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
about higher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
education
overshadow cons such as difficult to finance budgets and not care on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
areas.

The main benefit of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
paid in a form of colleges and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
universities
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fees
is that international
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
come
from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poor
countries into develop
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
to take higher studies
as well
as a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
is those
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
wise and bright in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
education
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
not able to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pay
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
charges
of higher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
education
Possible spelling mistake. 'centres' is British English.
centres
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
it is helpful for them
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
providing them scholarships.
In addition
to this, in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
a few
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
If 'people' is plural here, don't use the third-person singular verb.
is
suffering from poverty
as well
as not eligible to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pay
colleges and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
universities
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fees
of their
Possible spelling mistake. Did you mean "offspring", the plural form of the noun 'offspring'?
offsprings
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
in that case
it is responsibility of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
authorities
to give aid to them as they are citizens of those countries.
For example
, in Canada a native
Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean "learner"?
learners
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
are
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poor
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
better in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
education
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
Canadian
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regime
give scholarships to them for continuing their studies and offer scholarships to foreign students.

The another major advantage is that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
to
Possible spelling mistake. 'organising' is British English.
organising
campaigns to motivate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
to take higher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
education
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
learners
are the future of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
.
Furthermore
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
parents are not
Consider using a past participle here: "been".
be
able to fill the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
charges
of colleges and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
universities
of their offspring
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that it why they
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stop
sending their children into higher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
education
Possible spelling mistake. 'centres' is British English.
centres
and these camps
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
to in courage those guardians to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
send
their children into colleges.
Even though
, educational campaigns are necessary for lazy masses to educate them about studies as they negligible to go in colleges and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
universities
.
For instance
, in India there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
areas
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
are living under poverty and their offspring is not going into higher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
education
Possible spelling mistake. 'centres' is British English.
centres
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that is
why a majority of members
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
hired by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regime
visit there and give tuition classes to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
learners
and motivate them to take higher education.

Nevertheless
, the main on phase of this notion is that if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
authorities
will spend a vast amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
on upgrading
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
education
services and neglect
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
areas than it is perilous for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
up their budgets.
Moreover
, there are lots of concern areas like health care, job sectors and etcetera
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
also
demanding funds from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regime
of their enhancement as they are crucial for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
to providing income. Apart from this, if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regime
will
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pay
fess of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
progenitors will
be felt
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
authorities
will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
show
differences with them.
For example
, in China
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regime
announced that they should
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pay
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
charges
of poorer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
learners
of Colleges and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
universities
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
parents
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
are eligible for paying
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fees
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
doing protests
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
they
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
authorities
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
disparities between them.

In conclusion
, although it is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
learners
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
Did you mean "live"? Alternatively, check whether the singular of 'learners' should be used.
lives
under poverty paid their higher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
education
Possible spelling mistake. 'centres' is British English.
centres
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fees
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
authorities
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regime
will
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pay
huge
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
education
system than it is stressful for others such as health, public transport, job sectors and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
on.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay In some countries students pay college fees and University fees themselves but in others it is paid by others. Do the advantages of government money outweigh the disadvantage?

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
544 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts