Nowadays, the demand for housing is higher than ever before, yet only rural areas can keep pace with the demand for the new development of this sort due to space scarcity in urban areas. While it is a matter of concern, I personally think that unspoilt countryside exceeds all other concerns from environmental, economic, and aesthetic points of view.
New housing estates in the green belt have catastrophic impacts on the economy and environment because of occupying land which is better used for forestry and agriculture. As a result, agricultural productivity declines. On top of that, deforestation allows a huge amount of toxic gases to be released into the atmosphere. It is reasonable to assume that the more development of the countryside takes place, the worse these two crucial sectors are likely to pay the price, imperilling food security and environmental safeguards.
Likewise, the natural beauty and heritage of local residents built by past generations and the way they connect with the gentle landscape are a key component of the attractiveness of the tranquil countryside. If more new homes to be built in rural areas, it would inevitably spoil the rustic charm resulting in a decrease in tourist attractions. For example, many countries in the Asian region have lost its tourist attractions due to such property development. Thus, not only does housing development mar the aesthetic beauty, but also jeopardize the government revenue as tourism contributes to a huge proportion of GDP.
Admittedly, if property development cannot occur in rural areas, the burden must fall somewhere else. For example, going vertical like many developed countries could be a solution to the increasing housing demand. However, satisfying housing demand should not come at a high price of the peaceful countryside that is vital to economics, environment, and aesthetic appeal.
To conclude, although adequate accommodation is essential, I firmly believe that conservation of the quiet countryside requires to be prioritized so as to protect economies, environment, and aesthetic attractions. This position is fairly logical because the importance of the latter exceeds that of the former.
Nowadays, the
demand
for housing is higher than ever
before
,
yet
only
rural
areas
can
keep
pace with the
demand
for the new
development
of this sort due to space scarcity in urban
areas
. While it is a matter of concern, I
personally
think
that
unspoilt
countryside
exceeds all other concerns from environmental, economic, and
aesthetic
points of view.
New housing estates in the green belt have catastrophic impacts on the economy and environment
because
of occupying land which is better
used
for forestry and agriculture.
As a result
, agricultural productivity declines.
On top of that
, deforestation
allows
a huge amount of toxic gases to
be released
into the atmosphere. It is reasonable to assume that the more
development
of the
countryside
takes place, the worse these two crucial sectors are likely to pay the price,
imperilling
food security and environmental safeguards.
Likewise
, the natural beauty and heritage of local residents built by past generations and the way they connect with the gentle landscape are a key component of the attractiveness of the tranquil
countryside
. If more new homes to
be built
in rural
areas
, it would
inevitably
spoil the rustic charm resulting in a decrease in tourist attractions.
For example
,
many
countries in the Asian region have lost its tourist attractions due to such property
development
.
Thus
, not
only
does housing
development
mar the
aesthetic
beauty,
but
also
jeopardize the
government
revenue as tourism contributes to a huge proportion of GDP.
Admittedly
, if property
development
cannot occur in rural
areas
, the burden
must
fall somewhere else.
For example
, going vertical like
many
developed countries
could be a solution to the increasing housing
demand
.
However
, satisfying housing
demand
should not
come
at a high price of the peaceful
countryside
that is
vital to economics, environment, and
aesthetic
appeal.
To conclude
, although adequate accommodation is essential, I
firmly
believe that conservation of the quiet
countryside
requires to
be prioritized
so as to
protect economies, environment, and
aesthetic
attractions. This position is
fairly
logical
because
the importance of the latter exceeds that of the former.