In the contemporary era, education and medical facilities Play a vital role in the societal development. People have split opinion on the approach that weather the government should force the newly graduated teachers and doctors to work in the countryside or it should be left them to decide. They have rights to opt their work place as far as I am concerned. I will examine both views and will corroborate my stance in the ensuing paragraphs.
On the other hand, there are plethora of reasons that why they should work in rural areas. The first and foremost one is, people in remote places also need educational and medical facilities as much as people in the cities to make rural people more independent. Another noticeable reason is, it is government's responsibility to make sure that all citizens are able to get such teaching and health facilities. As a result, the government provides educational loans to some of the educatees, so those who are studying on government's grants must serve in less developed ares and support the government in its objective.
On the other hand, in democratic countries, it is everyone has a right to choose where they work, no one can compel them. For instance, in india according to law of article 19(A) everyone is free to do whatever they want. Moreover, if they have to work even if they are not interested. Thus, they get disappointed and it may hamper the quality of their work. In addition to this, thay chances of brain-drain may increase and people may migrate to other countries if they are forced by the authority to work out of their comfort zone.
To conclude, I would like to say that, according to law and to improve quality of work. It should be left to teachers and doctors to select their place of work. 
In the contemporary era, education and medical facilities Play a vital role in the societal development.  
People
 have split opinion on the approach that weather the  
government
 should force the  
newly
 graduated teachers and doctors to  
work
 in the countryside or it should be  
left
 them to decide. They have rights to opt their  
work
 place as far as I  
am concerned
. I will examine both views and will corroborate my stance in the ensuing paragraphs. 
On the other hand
, there are plethora of reasons that why they should  
work
 in rural areas. The  
first
 and foremost one is,  
people
 in remote places  
also
 need educational and medical facilities as much as  
people
 in the cities to  
make
 rural  
people
 more independent. Another noticeable reason is, it is  
government
's responsibility to  
make
 sure that all citizens are able to  
get
 such teaching and health facilities.  
As a result
, the  
government
 provides educational loans to  
some of the
  educatees
,  
so
 those who are studying on  
government
's grants  
must
 serve in less developed ares and support the  
government
 in its objective. 
On the other hand
, in democratic countries, it is everyone has a right to choose where they  
work
, no one can compel them.  
For instance
, in  
india
 according to law of article 19(A) everyone is free to do whatever they want.  
Moreover
, if they  
have to
  work
 even if they are not interested.  
Thus
, they  
get
 disappointed and it may hamper the quality of their  
work
.  
In addition
 to this,  
thay
 chances of brain-drain may increase and  
people
 may migrate to other countries if they  
are forced
 by the authority to  
work
 out of their comfort zone. 
To conclude
, I would like to say that, according to law and to  
improve
 quality of  
work
. It should be  
left
 to teachers and doctors to select their place of  
work
.