Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

In companies, promotions to high positions should be given to employees inside the company and not to somebody outside the company or new hiring. Agree or disagree?

It is a debatable issue that hiring for the top position should be given to the existing employee in the company or hires someone from outside with better experience. I do not accord with the statement and will give a careful analysis of which one is suitable for the higher position in the organizations. To commence with, there are a plethora of benefits when employers should give the promotion of their company worker. Firstly, the employee of the industry should know about internal affairs, rules, and regulations of the company. He or she does not need much training for the vacant position. Moreover, the employer does not need to pay their current employee much salary as little increment according to the experience will be enough for the individual. Secondly, he or she will do more hard work and put more effort into the job. It is also extremely important in the business to give promotions, rewards, and prizes to the staff that devotes a long time in the company. On the other hand, there are numerous positives aspects when any job vacancy is given to an outside experienced person. The most imperative advantage, when an owner of the corporate employs skilled folks, they worked with the new techniques and qualities which they gain from the other company. He brings new ideas for the business which might raise the company profits. Apart from this, if the employee is experienced in their role then he or she does not need much training. In conclusion, promotions can be done case to case basis. I firmly believe it is duty of the HR department to whether a position would be filled by outside or inside of the company

It is a debatable issue that hiring for the top You use this word too often, consider replacing it withareapointspotseatenvironmentstand
position
 should be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
 to the existing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employee
 in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
company
 or hires someone from outside with better experience. I do not accord with the statement and will give a careful analysis of which one is suitable for the higher You use this word too often, consider replacing it withareapointspotseatenvironmentstand
position
 in the organizations.

To commence with, there are a plethora of benefits when employers should give the promotion of their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
company
 worker. Firstly
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employee
 of the industry should know about internal affairs, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :requirements
rules
, and regulations of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
company
. He or she does not need much training for the vacant You use this word too often, consider replacing it withareapointspotseatenvironmentstand
position
. Moreover
, the employer does not need to pay their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :contemporarymodern
current
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employee
 much salary as This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:tiny
little
 increment according to the experience will be This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:abundance
enough
 for the individual. Secondly
, he or she will do more This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :arduous
hard
 work and put more effort into the job. It is also
extremely
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:vitalcriticalessential
important
 in the business to give promotions, rewards, and prizes to the staff that devotes a long time in the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :enterprisecorporation
company
.

On the other hand
, there are numerous positives aspects when any job vacancy is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
 to an outside experienced person. The most imperative advantage, when an owner of the corporate employs skilled folks, they worked with the new techniques and qualities which they gain from the other You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
company
. He brings new This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtsconceptsnotions
ideas
 for the business which might raise the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
company
 profits. Apart from this, if the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employee
is experienced
 in their role then he or she does not need much training.

In conclusion
, promotions can be done
 case to case basis. I firmly
 believe it is duty of the HR department to whether a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withareapointspotseatenvironmentstand
position
 would be filled
 by outside or This phrase is redundant. Consider using "inside".inside
inside of
 the Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraphcompany.company!company?company:company,company;
company