To begin with firstly the post records of criminal prevents the wrong decision by the jury member if Preson was quity of killings or murders the jury was considered that he or she is able to do wrong decision in difficult situations for save their like some people kill the girl so girl take quietly decisions such as killing that person for save her self hence it is proved that the jury seems to be incorrect. However previous crimes recordes might help jury to indentify the feature of the person in details and compared them with present facts on other hands when the jury is not given the facts of post criminal records they could not repeated the whole responsibility of their decision. The occused may be recognised the quaitless. For example high qualified lawyers are able to use rule in the lower to liberate their clients even if defendant is quitely. Moreover people who many offenses In the past many look incorrect therefore it is evidence that the seems to be misled by the present position In conclusion the jury should only be given information of the accused person who was brought to repeated many times therefore this practice should be used according to the crime solution
To
begin
with
firstly
the post records of criminal
prevents
the
wrong
decision
by the
jury
member if
Preson
was
quity
of killings or murders the
jury
was considered
that he or she is able to do
wrong
decision
in difficult situations for save their like
some
people
kill the girl
so
girl take
quietly
decisions
such as killing that person for save her self
hence
it
is proved
that the
jury
seems to be incorrect.
However
previous crimes
recordes
might
help
jury
to
indentify
the feature of the person in
details
and compared them with present facts on other hands when the
jury
is not
given
the facts of post criminal records they could not
repeated
the whole responsibility of their
decision
. The
occused
may be
recognised
the
quaitless
.
For example
high qualified lawyers are able to
use
rule
in the lower to liberate their clients even if defendant is
quitely
.
Moreover
people
who
many
offenses In the past
many
look incorrect
therefore
it is evidence that the seems to
be misled
by the present position
In conclusion
the
jury
should
only
be
given
information of the accused person who
was brought
to repeated
many
times
therefore
this practice should be
used
according to the crime
solution