The passage and lecture hold two opposing views about the importance of following news. The reading passage proposes three possible reasons for the benefits of the news that they are very good for people. However, the lecturer seems to casts doubts on the elucidations explained by the author. Believing that news is confusing, the professor finds readings proofs unconvincing and she disproves each reason mentioned in the text, specifically.
To begin with, the first reason described by the author regarding the fact that news induces our mind and emotion. However, the speaker finds this statement debatable and refute it. He asserts that news encourages a bad part of our mind and it can be dangerous. Furthermore, she says that the news is not good for our brains. Consequently, we should not look news many times.
Secondly, it is proposed in the reading passage that news is irrelevant that caused some problems. This point is rebutted by the lecturer and she claims that although some news may be irrelevant we can find our favorite genre. Also, we can find some new areas for tracking news about that area. As a result of finding good and new topics, we can learn more about them.
Finally, whereas the author states the idea that news is a waste of time, the professor disproves this belief by explaining that we can save our time by watching the news. By news information, we can have more free time and spend it on other activities.
The passage and lecture hold two opposing views about the importance of following
news
. The reading passage proposes three possible reasons for the benefits of the
news
that they are
very
good
for
people
.
However
, the lecturer seems to
casts
doubts on the elucidations
explained
by the author. Believing that
news
is confusing, the professor
finds
readings proofs
unconvincing and
she disproves each reason mentioned in the text,
specifically
.
To
begin
with, the
first
reason
described
by the author regarding the fact that
news
induces our mind and emotion.
However
, the speaker
finds
this statement debatable and refute it. He asserts that
news
encourages a
bad
part of our mind and it can be
dangerous
.
Furthermore
, she says that the
news
is not
good
for our brains.
Consequently
, we should not look
news
many
times.
Secondly
, it
is proposed
in the reading passage that
news
is irrelevant that caused
some
problems. This point
is rebutted
by the
lecturer and
she claims that although
some
news
may be irrelevant we can
find
our favorite genre.
Also
, we can
find
some
new
areas for tracking
news
about that area.
As a result
of finding
good
and
new
topics, we can learn more about them.
Finally
, whereas the author states the
idea
that
news
is a waste of time, the professor disproves this belief by explaining that we can save our time by watching the
news
. By
news
information, we can have more free time and spend it on other activities.