Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Globalization is creating a world of one culture and destroying national identity. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Globalization is creating a world of one culture and destroying national identity. with this statement? mKr8
Globalization demolishes the identity of many countries and it influences cultures around the world to become the same. I completely agree with this argument that it leads to different nations to be the same. The same style of clothing, as well as disappearance of different nationalities among continents will prove my stand point. To begin, globalization effects to the way of dressing around the world. What it means is that most populations of the world always follow to the latest style of clothing, as a result, people may not separate or find the differences between European and Asian nations, because dressing, making up and even the style of living have been becoming the same. For example, when some people go to Asia or America, they may not face difficulties, especially culture shock, due to not having diversity of the style. Apart from globalization influences to traditional style of every nation, I believe that it also destroy the identity of a country. That is to say, the nationality has been disappearing in every country because of contemporaneity. Many people’s lifestyles have been changing throughout the world. For instance, some fast foods have been become as popular as country’s national food such as pizza, hamburger and hot-dog. In addition, the branches of McDonald`s fast food are situated almost 200 country. Therefore, some people including me think that the identity of some countries can be destroyed by development. In conclusion, although many people believe that globalization is having negative effects on the identity of nations, I believe that the population of the world may not face some difficulties when they visit another country.
Globalization demolishes the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
identity
of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
and it influences cultures around the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
to become the same. I completely
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with this argument that it leads to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
to be the same. The same
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
style
of clothing,
as well
as disappearance of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
nationalities among continents will prove my stand point.

To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
, globalization effects to the way of dressing around the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
. What it means is that most populations of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
always follow to the latest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
style
of clothing,
as a result
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
may not separate or find the differences between European and Asian
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
dressing, making up and even the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
style
of living have been becoming the same.
For example
, when
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
go to Asia or America, they may not face difficulties,
especially
culture shock, due to not having diversity of the style.

Apart from globalization influences to traditional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
style
of every
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nation
, I believe that it
also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
destroy
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
identity
of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
.
That is
to say, the nationality has been disappearing in every
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of contemporaneity.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people’s
lifestyles have been changing throughout the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
.
For instance
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
fast
foods have
been become
as popular as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country’s
national food such as pizza, hamburger and hot-dog.
In addition
, the branches of
The character between 'McDonald' and 's' is an accent character, not a standard apostrophe character. Use "McDonald’s" (curly apostrophe) or "McDonald's" (straight apostrophe).
McDonald`s
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
fast
food
are situated
almost 200
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
.
Therefore
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
including me
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
identity
of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
destroyed
by development.

In conclusion
, although
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
believe that globalization is having
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
effects on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
identity
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
, I believe that the population of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
may not face
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
difficulties when they visit another
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Globalization is creating a world of one culture and destroying national identity. with this statement?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
270 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Globalization is creating a world of one culture and destroying national identity. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?