Trees are the integral part of our lives. It has been observed that more and more trees are being cutting down that, in future, leads to end of this world. I completely associate with this thought. Ideas articulated further in this discourse will support my stand and at the same time highlight certain contradictory views that others in the society might possibly have.
The topmost reason for my belief is global warming. Excessive deforestation defiantly has many repercussions and one of them is this. Weather change is one of the example what we are facing right now. Normally, summer starts from April but this year it started from March itself. This can be a wakeup call for all us otherwise we will lose our globe.
Another reason for me to uphold this view is forest facilitates us with oxygen. Trees omit oxygen during photosynthesis process and takes cardan dioxide, which is toxic for human if the quantity of it exceed a particular limit. Therefore, we, humans, are dependent on forest for giving us fresh oxygen that is necessity of anyone. To cite an example, the Amazon Rain forest produces 20% of O2 that is the maximum amount of O2provider.
Paradoxically, there are individuals in the society who are of the up-hold that Cutting of trees is not being considered as deadly activity. One of the plausible reasons for this view is increasing number of planting new plants. They believe that to cover up the deforestation activities, government is also encouraging afforestation, in which government is planting new plants as well as taking care of them. This estimation, perhaps, stems from the fact that accommodation for people. Because of the rapid increase in population, there is a shortage for the land to live on. To provide shelters to people, cutting of forest is mandatory, that will help to build house for houseless folks.
In conclusion, notstandingwith contradiction, I am of the firm opinion that big trees cannot be replaced by the small plants as small plants would take many years to give benefits that older trees are giving at present. 
 Trees
 are the integral part of our  
lives
. It has  
been observed
 that more and more  
trees
 are being cutting down that,  
in future
, leads to  
end
 of this world. I completely associate with this  
thought
.  
Ideas
 articulated  
further
 in this discourse will support my stand and at the same time highlight certain contradictory views that others in the society might  
possibly
 have.
The topmost reason for my belief is global warming. Excessive deforestation  
defiantly
 has  
many
 repercussions and one of them is this. Weather  
change
 is one of the example what we are facing right  
now
.  
Normally
, summer  
starts
 from April  
but
 this year it  
started
 from March itself. This can be a  
wakeup
 call for all us  
otherwise
 we will lose our globe.
Another reason for me to uphold this view is  
forest
 facilitates us with oxygen.  
Trees
 omit oxygen during photosynthesis process and takes  
cardan
 dioxide, which is toxic for human if the quantity of it exceed a particular limit.  
Therefore
, we, humans, are dependent on  
forest
 for giving us fresh oxygen  
that is
 necessity of anyone. To cite an example, the Amazon Rain  
forest
 produces 20% of O2  
that is
 the maximum amount of O2provider. 
Paradoxically
, there are individuals in the society who are of the up-hold that Cutting of  
trees
 is not  
being considered
 as deadly activity. One of the plausible reasons for this view is increasing number of planting new  
plants
. They believe that to cover up the deforestation activities,  
government
 is  
also
 encouraging afforestation, in which  
government
 is planting new  
plants
  as well
 as taking care of them. This estimation, perhaps, stems from the fact that accommodation for  
people
.  
Because
 of the rapid increase in population, there is a shortage for the land to  
live
 on. To provide shelters to  
people
, cutting of  
forest
 is mandatory, that will  
help
 to build  
house
 for  
houseless
 folks. 
In conclusion
,  
notstandingwith
 contradiction, I am of the firm opinion that  
big
  trees
 cannot  
be replaced
 by the  
small
  plants
 as  
small
  plants
 would take  
many
 years to give benefits that older  
trees
 are giving at present.