Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Forests are the lungs of the earth. Destructions of the world’s forests amounts to death of the world we currently know. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Forests are the lungs of the earth. Destructions of the world’s forests amounts to death of the world we currently know. 8q8w
Trees are the integral part of our lives. It has been observed that more and more trees are being cutting down that, in future, leads to end of this world. I completely associate with this thought. Ideas articulated further in this discourse will support my stand and at the same time highlight certain contradictory views that others in the society might possibly have. The topmost reason for my belief is global warming. Excessive deforestation defiantly has many repercussions and one of them is this. Weather change is one of the example what we are facing right now. Normally, summer starts from April but this year it started from March itself. This can be a wakeup call for all us otherwise we will lose our globe. Another reason for me to uphold this view is forest facilitates us with oxygen. Trees omit oxygen during photosynthesis process and takes cardan dioxide, which is toxic for human if the quantity of it exceed a particular limit. Therefore, we, humans, are dependent on forest for giving us fresh oxygen that is necessity of anyone. To cite an example, the Amazon Rain forest produces 20% of O2 that is the maximum amount of O2provider. Paradoxically, there are individuals in the society who are of the up-hold that Cutting of trees is not being considered as deadly activity. One of the plausible reasons for this view is increasing number of planting new plants. They believe that to cover up the deforestation activities, government is also encouraging afforestation, in which government is planting new plants as well as taking care of them. This estimation, perhaps, stems from the fact that accommodation for people. Because of the rapid increase in population, there is a shortage for the land to live on. To provide shelters to people, cutting of forest is mandatory, that will help to build house for houseless folks. In conclusion, notstandingwith contradiction, I am of the firm opinion that big trees cannot be replaced by the small plants as small plants would take many years to give benefits that older trees are giving at present.
Trees
are the integral part of our
lives
. It has
been observed
that more and more
trees
are being cutting down that,
in future
, leads to
end
of this world. I completely associate with this
thought
.
Ideas
articulated
further
in this discourse will support my stand and at the same time highlight certain contradictory views that others in the society might
possibly
have.

The topmost reason for my belief is global warming. Excessive deforestation
defiantly
has
many
repercussions and one of them is this. Weather
change
is one of the example what we are facing right
now
.
Normally
, summer
starts
from April
but
this year it
started
from March itself. This can be a
wakeup
call for all us
otherwise
we will lose our globe.

Another reason for me to uphold this view is
forest
facilitates us with oxygen.
Trees
omit oxygen during photosynthesis process and takes
cardan
dioxide, which is toxic for human if the quantity of it exceed a particular limit.
Therefore
, we, humans, are dependent on
forest
for giving us fresh oxygen
that is
necessity of anyone. To cite an example, the Amazon Rain
forest
produces 20% of O2
that is
the maximum amount of O2provider.

Paradoxically
, there are individuals in the society who are of the up-hold that Cutting of
trees
is not
being considered
as deadly activity. One of the plausible reasons for this view is increasing number of planting new
plants
. They believe that to cover up the deforestation activities,
government
is
also
encouraging afforestation, in which
government
is planting new
plants
as well
as taking care of them. This estimation, perhaps, stems from the fact that accommodation for
people
.
Because
of the rapid increase in population, there is a shortage for the land to
live
on. To provide shelters to
people
, cutting of
forest
is mandatory, that will
help
to build
house
for
houseless
folks.

In conclusion
,
notstandingwith
contradiction, I am of the firm opinion that
big
trees
cannot
be replaced
by the
small
plants
as
small
plants
would take
many
years to give benefits that older
trees
are giving at present.
What do you think?
  • FunnyFunny
  • LoveLove
  • WowWow
  • AngryAngry
  • SadSad
Show Comments
Knowledge of languages is the doorway to wisdom.
Roger Bacon

IELTS essay Forests are the lungs of the earth. Destructions of the world’s forests amounts to death of the world we currently know.

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
349 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts