The passage asserts that there are three powerful argumnts which show the Robert Peary reached to the North pole. The professor states that mentioned reasons by the passage are not solid and they are unconvincing, and she rejects each arguments provided by the passage.
First, the article claims that the National Geographic committee reveals that Peary reached to the Pole, since they found some records and equipments of him. The lecture, on the contrary, debunks this point by explaining that it is true that commitee reported this records, but they were some close friends of Peary in the commitee who were not biased regarding to the results, and they fund the research by money.
Second, the time of travel to North Pole was repeated by another advanturer named Tom Avery traveled in same way Peary took by dogsled, according to the reading. The professor rebuts this view by reasoning that Avery reached to the North pole by airplane not on feet, and also the weather condition was very different than that of Peary time and he travelled in a diverse way.
Third, the article imparts that Measuring the position of sun in shadow in photo taken by Peary in North Pole is another reason which shows he reached the Pole. The lecture disavows this point by explaining that scientists examined these shadows precisely, and shadows were fuzzy and unfocused, since after hundreds years the photo were blured and those pictures did not show position of sun accurately
The passage asserts that there are three powerful
argumnts
which
show
the Robert Peary
reached
to the
North
pole
. The professor states that mentioned reasons by the passage are not
solid and
they are unconvincing, and she rejects each
arguments
provided by the passage.
First
, the article claims that the National Geographic committee reveals that Peary
reached
to the
Pole
, since they found
some
records and equipments of him. The lecture,
on the contrary
, debunks this point by explaining that it is true that
commitee
reported this records,
but
they were
some
close friends of Peary in the
commitee
who were not biased
regarding to
the results, and they fund the research by money.
Second, the time of travel to
North
Pole
was repeated
by another
advanturer
named Tom Avery traveled in same way Peary took by dogsled, according to the reading. The professor rebuts this view by reasoning that Avery
reached
to the
North
pole
by airplane not on feet, and
also
the weather condition was
very
different
than
that of Peary
time and
he travelled
in a diverse way
.
Third, the article imparts that Measuring the position of sun in shadow in photo taken by Peary in
North
Pole
is another reason which
shows
he
reached
the
Pole
. The lecture disavows this point by explaining that scientists examined these shadows
precisely
, and shadows were fuzzy and unfocused, since after hundreds years the photo were
blured
and those pictures did not
show
position of sun
accurately