It is no doubt true that technology has reduced the size of the world. To this effect, some are considering global culture has been beneficial to the continent. In my opinion, I totally disagree because it makes the place boring and the economy could be laid back.
Firstly, imbibing a single custom globally could make the entire land uninteresting. That is to say, nothing would fascinate anyone on the other side of one's present location. Although in the past and currently, people looked and are looking forward to going to places to explore the tradition of others but, when this is synchronized, the excitement and morale would be deadened. Due to these unpleasant outcomes, it would be preferable to continue to have diversities of culture.
Lastly, the financial status of the world might crumble. In other words, funds realised from tourism as a result of people travelling to places will decline when culture is amalgamated. Since there would not be any new experience on the other side, neither an excitement not fin to catch, citizens will remain where they are and a huge amount of money will be lost as this unfolds. For instance, the Ministry of Tourism in Nigeria reported that the money Nigerians spend on travelling alone is about 65%of the total budget for the year. Therefore, the countries enjoying these funds would longer do when the harmonization is affected, hence, a decrease in the economy of such places.
In conclusion, in spite of people's views about the importance of globalization of the traditions I have a contrary opinion because of the fact that traditions will be extinguished the and it might be a disservice to the economy.
It is no doubt true that technology has
reduced
the size of the world. To this effect,
some
are considering global culture has been beneficial to the continent. In my opinion, I
totally
disagree
because
it
makes
the place boring and the economy could
be laid
back.
Firstly
, imbibing a single custom globally could
make
the entire land uninteresting.
That is
to say, nothing would fascinate anyone on the
other
side of one's present location. Although in the past and
currently
,
people
looked and are looking forward to going to places to explore the tradition of others
but
, when this
is synchronized
, the excitement and morale would
be deadened
. Due to these unpleasant outcomes, it would be preferable to continue to have diversities of culture.
Lastly
, the financial status of the world might crumble. In
other
words, funds
realised
from tourism
as a result
of
people
travelling to places will decline when culture
is amalgamated
. Since there would not be any new experience on the
other
side, neither an excitement not fin to catch, citizens will remain where they are and a huge amount of money will
be lost
as this unfolds.
For instance
, the Ministry of Tourism in Nigeria reported that the money Nigerians spend on travelling alone is about 65%of the total budget for the year.
Therefore
, the countries enjoying these funds would longer do when the harmonization is
affected
,
hence
, a decrease in the economy of such places.
In conclusion
,
in spite of
people
's views about the importance of globalization of the traditions I have a contrary opinion
because of the fact that
traditions will
be extinguished
the and it might be a disservice to the economy.