Assessment is an essential sector of language learning. Yet while this statement is embraced with universal approval, the measurement remains the centre of hot debates. Among the tools of language proficiency testing, IELTS (International English Language Testing System) occupies a prominent position, acclaimed for its practicality and validity across the four skills. However, such praises have been inevitably subjected to numerous criticism that question the applicability advertised. From a personal perspective, I advocate the notion that provided the test is taken advantage of under appropriate contexts, the IELTS exam is an efficient method of evaluating learners' general communicative and academic competence.
Prior to considering the merits or the drawbacks of the IELTS, it is crucial to construct a general view on the features and the functions the test targets. IELTS consists of four sub skills, Listening, Reading, Writing and Speaking, which exert equal influence on the overall band score. The focus of this proficiency assessment examination is to measure the ability to manipulate English in real life situations, hence the deliberate restraint of implementing topics requiring specialised knowledge. The grading process is conducted by a well-trained panel of assessors and with the assistance of rubrics with detailed and explicit descriptions on the multiple categorized criterias. This system of arrangement and the predetermined goal have, therefore, brought about significant benefits.
First and foremost, IELTS facilitates learners’ effective communication ability since it is professionally designed to be in compliance with the target of developing English use in general contexts. It is acknowledged that in order to achieve a desirable band score, learners should be capable of integrating the elements of formality and informality. The speaking and writing sections provide compelling evidence: while assessees are expected to produce two comprehensive essays demonstrating a rich academic lexical resource and the understanding of complex structures, more casual use of English is desired in the speaking test. Furthermore, the IELTS examination designers strive to cater to a wide range of familiar and peculiar topics. This minimizes the unfavorable circumstances in which learners perform excellently by producing works merely from memory. As a result, the reliability of the test is guaranteed. The fact that the number of academic institutions demanding an IELTS certificate as a prerequisite for successful registration exceeds over 10, 000 has further confirmed the value of the well-constructed test.
In addition, the proficiency assessment, IELTS, provides direction signs that guide learners on the journey of English conquering. One of the principles that contribute significantly to the reputation of the test is the establishment of unobstructed and explicit marking criteria, which reflect learners’ English level on multiple grade scales and aspects. An illustration can be derived from the assessment of Task 2 in the writing sector, in which test takers are required to produce a comprehensive essay including at least 250 words in response to a provided topic. During the process of determining the band score, the examiners take into consideration the variety, accuracy and appropriacy of the grammatical structures and vocabulary, the coherence and cohesion as well as how the question has been addressed. Each of these aspects is contemplated and subsequently receives a corresponding band. Based on the descriptions of the published criteria chart, learners gain a profound insight into their current English status by identifying their strengths and areas needed for further improvement. Such knowledge plays a fundamental role in deducing the most practical learning procedures with the highest likelihood of producing fruitful results. Likewise, the ability to perceive one’s gradual advancement by following the procedures is the crucial source of motivation and aspiration to achieve higher goals.
Meanwhile, the emergence of skepticism and disapprovals flourish from the misunderstanding of the IELTS test’s primary functions. In line with the assertion that IELTS measures one’s competencies in general contexts, the test remains a safe distance from any specialised academic fields. Thus, it is unrealistic to expect that achieving an admirable band score is synonymous to the effortless understanding of highly academic and scientific materials. Notably, despite the intellectual and professional investments to eliminate wash-back, a condition in which learners acquire merely the content supposed to appear in the test, numerous language centers and individuals invariably narrow the scope of topics to be covered meticulously. While the ratio of what being learnt to what being potentially assessed remains below one, the proportion of fortunate nevertheless exists. Thus, the possibility of wash back leading to remarkable band score is the underlying cause of an impatible performance in English when the assessees are confronted with the variety of real life situations. However, this is a ubiquitous issue in education, hence the irrationality of criticizing the IELTS test without pinpointing similar occurrences in other assessment forms.
In conclusion, founded on the ground of facilitating learners’ capability to use English in casual communication settings, IELTS indisputably assists learners and teachers to obtain credible data on one’s language competencies. In combination with the explicit descriptions provided by the assessment charts, the most constructive learning procedures can be established and stimulation is generated. Hence, with a comprehensive view between the functions of IELTS and one’s target of English learning, the test promises to provide significant assistance in language acquisition.
Assessment
is an essential sector of
language
learning
.
Yet
while this statement
is embraced
with universal approval, the measurement remains the
centre
of hot debates. Among the tools of
language
proficiency testing, IELTS (International English
Language
Testing System) occupies a prominent position, acclaimed for its practicality and validity across the four
skills
.
However
, such praises have been
inevitably
subjected to numerous criticism that question the applicability advertised. From a personal perspective, I advocate the notion that provided the
test
is taken
advantage of under appropriate contexts, the IELTS exam is an efficient method of evaluating learners' general communicative and
academic
competence.
Prior to considering the merits or the drawbacks of the IELTS, it is crucial to construct a general view on the features and the functions the
test
targets. IELTS consists of four sub
skills
, Listening, Reading, Writing and Speaking, which exert equal influence on the
overall
band
score
. The focus of this proficiency
assessment
examination is to measure the ability to manipulate English in real life situations,
hence
the deliberate restraint of implementing
topics
requiring
specialised
knowledge. The grading process
is conducted
by a well-trained panel of assessors and with the assistance of rubrics with detailed and explicit descriptions on the multiple categorized
criterias
. This system of arrangement and the predetermined goal have,
therefore
, brought about significant benefits.
First
and foremost, IELTS facilitates
learners’
effective communication ability since it is
professionally
designed to be in compliance with the target of developing English
use
in general
contexts. It
is acknowledged
that in order to achieve a desirable
band
score
,
learners
should be capable of integrating the elements of formality and informality. The speaking and writing sections provide compelling evidence: while
assessees
are
expected
to produce two comprehensive essays demonstrating a rich
academic
lexical resource and the understanding of complex structures, more casual
use
of English
is desired
in the speaking
test
.
Furthermore
, the IELTS examination designers strive to cater to a wide range of familiar and peculiar
topics
. This minimizes the unfavorable circumstances in which
learners
perform
excellently
by producing works
merely
from memory.
As a result
, the reliability of the
test
is guaranteed
. The fact that the number of
academic
institutions demanding an IELTS certificate as a prerequisite for successful registration exceeds over 10, 000 has
further
confirmed the value of the well-constructed
test
.
In addition
, the proficiency
assessment
, IELTS, provides direction signs that guide
learners
on the journey of English conquering. One of the principles that contribute
significantly
to the reputation of the
test
is the establishment of unobstructed and explicit marking criteria, which reflect
learners’
English level on multiple grade scales and aspects. An illustration can
be derived
from the
assessment
of Task 2 in the writing sector, in which
test
takers
are required
to produce a comprehensive essay including at least 250 words in response to a provided
topic
. During the process of determining the
band
score
, the examiners take into consideration the variety, accuracy and
appropriacy
of the grammatical structures and vocabulary, the coherence and cohesion
as well
as how the question has
been addressed
. Each of these aspects
is contemplated
and
subsequently
receives a corresponding
band
. Based on the descriptions of the published criteria chart,
learners
gain a profound insight into their
current
English status by identifying their strengths and areas needed for
further
improvement. Such knowledge plays a fundamental role in deducing the most practical
learning
procedures with the highest likelihood of producing fruitful results.
Likewise
, the ability to perceive one’s gradual advancement by following the procedures is the crucial source of motivation and aspiration to achieve higher goals.
Meanwhile, the emergence of skepticism and
disapprovals
flourish from the misunderstanding of the IELTS
test’s
primary functions. In line with the assertion that IELTS measures one’s competencies
in general
contexts, the
test
remains a safe distance from any
specialised
academic
fields.
Thus
, it is unrealistic to
expect
that achieving an admirable
band
score
is synonymous to the effortless understanding of
highly
academic
and scientific materials.
Notably
, despite the intellectual and professional investments to eliminate wash-back, a condition in which
learners
acquire
merely
the content supposed to appear in the
test
, numerous
language
centers and individuals
invariably
narrow the scope of
topics
to
be covered
meticulously
. While the ratio of what being
learnt
to what being
potentially
assessed remains below one, the proportion of fortunate
nevertheless
exists.
Thus
, the possibility of wash back leading to remarkable
band
score
is the underlying cause of an
impatible
performance in English when the
assessees
are confronted
with the variety of real life situations.
However
, this is a ubiquitous issue in education,
hence
the irrationality of criticizing the IELTS
test
without pinpointing similar occurrences in other
assessment
forms.
In conclusion
, founded on the ground of facilitating
learners’
capability to
use
English in casual communication settings, IELTS
indisputably
assists
learners
and teachers to obtain credible data on one’s
language
competencies. In combination with the explicit descriptions provided by the
assessment
charts, the most constructive
learning
procedures can
be established
and stimulation
is generated
.
Hence
, with a comprehensive view between the functions of IELTS and one’s target of English
learning
, the
test
promises to provide significant assistance in
language
acquisition.