In the modern era as an economy is a developing it is necessary to require a large amount of money. It is often argued that nation who already have strongest health should different sorts of offer instead of monetary fund. I certainly disagree with this notion because money is the essential key brought development for any region. Further information about this will be discussed in the essay.
To begin with, a well set nation should give funds to backward ones. There are several reasons for this. First and foremost, if the economy gets the aid in the form of money they can spend in a sector where actually required. Which lead to boom a particular aspects of countries. For example, In 2003 USA built major School in Bhutan. However, Bhutan actually a lot requirement in medical as their health sector as very downward. So countries like Bhutan need of financial help instead of other aid.
Similarly, a country gets money from another nation can first pay their debt and release burden of interest. As a consequence, their economy grows in an efficient manner. For instance, in 2016 India got the fever from the Japan amount of 1000 crore. Which Indian used to pay their debt, as a result, a country grows rapidly and reported 8 % increase in GDP in next year.
To conclude, after musing both sides of the argument I believe that financial aid is the best way to encourage other nation. As other kind of help is not efficient and there are a several reasons to demonstrate that this is not the case.
In the modern era as an economy is a developing it is necessary to require a large amount of
money
. It is
often
argued that
nation
who already have
strongest
health should
different
sorts of offer
instead
of monetary fund. I
certainly
disagree with this notion
because
money
is the essential key brought development for any region.
Further
information about this will
be discussed
in the essay.
To
begin
with, a well set
nation
should give funds to backward ones. There are several reasons for this.
First
and foremost, if the economy
gets
the aid in the form of
money
they can spend in a sector where actually required.
Which
lead to boom a particular
aspects
of
countries
.
For example
, In 2003 USA built major School in Bhutan.
However
, Bhutan actually a lot requirement in medical as their health sector as
very
downward.
So
countries
like Bhutan need of financial
help
instead
of other aid.
Similarly
, a
country
gets
money
from another
nation
can
first
pay their debt and release burden of interest. As a consequence, their economy grows
in an efficient manner
.
For instance
, in 2016 India
got
the fever from the Japan amount of 1000
crore
. Which Indian
used
to pay their debt,
as a result
, a
country
grows
rapidly
and reported 8 % increase in GDP in
next
year.
To conclude
, after musing both sides of the argument I believe that financial aid is the best way to encourage other
nation
. As other kind of
help
is not efficient and there are a several reasons to demonstrate that this is not the case.