Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Cutting down rainforests is a necessary evil. In many of the countries where rainforests are disappearing, the people are very poor. Logging the rainforests provides many jobs, which help these poorpeople. The loggers, the truck drivers, and the shippers all receive work because of the logging industry. As well, once the land is cleared it can be used for more productive things. Farmers can grow crops on the land and ranchers can raise cattle. Finally, the wood itself is very useful. People use the wood for housing, fuel, furniture, and many other everyday items

Cutting down rainforests is a necessary evil. In many of the countries where rainforests are disappearing, the people are very poor. Logging the rainforests provides many jobs, which help these poorpeople. The loggers, the truck drivers, and the shippers all receive work because of the logging industry. As well, once the land is cleared it can be used for more productive things. Farmers can grow crops on the land and ranchers can raise cattle. Finally, the wood itself is very useful. People use the wood for housing, fuel, furniture, and many other everyday items Gnom
Some people hold the view that deforestation is an essential work bringing a range of advantages related to many social aspects. While this position is popular, it is not supported by the facts that this evil also have pessimistic effects. First of all, it is noticable that the jobs in term of logging industry are not sustainable and constant for everybody. Once the forest is exploited seriously and become out of resources, there will be no more works so people are unemployed and have to seek for another one. In addition, the loggers, drivers and shippers are paid only a very small amout of salary which still make them struggle with poverty. On the other hand, some other disciplines such as tourism could provide alternative jobs which are permanent and stable. Secondly, even though the empty land can be used on agricultural purposes, it is still not a logical idea that should be applied. When the forest is disappeared, topsoil erosion may increse so it will become unsuitable for raising cattle for any long period of time. Furthermore, the lack of trees may lead to air pollution and absence of protection so the crops can be damaged harshly and unable to grow steadily. Therefore, the authority should take action to deal with the problem such as doing reformation, supporting the farmers with equipment, ect. Finally, in spite of some benefits gained from woods, the rainforests should be sustained since they are also shelters for many species of flora and fauna. If deforestation occurs, animal populations will suffer dramatic losses when their natural habitat is altered. Hence, the loss of biological diversity will also rise significantly and lead to serious extinction of scarce plants. To prevent these potential situations, the government should enact laws of forest preservation to keep balance for the ecosystem. In conclusion, despite some possitive sides, cutting down rainforests is an impractical idea because of various drawbacks. Besides, people should prevent further damage from deforestation by stop doing it and concentrate on restore spoiled areas.
Some
people
hold the view that deforestation is an essential work bringing a range of advantages related to
many
social aspects. While this position is popular, it is not supported by the facts that this evil
also
have pessimistic effects.

First of all
, it is
noticable
that the jobs in term of logging industry are not sustainable and constant for everybody. Once the forest
is exploited
seriously
and become out of resources, there will be no more works
so
people
are unemployed
and
have to
seek for another one.
In addition
, the loggers, drivers and shippers
are paid
only
a
very
small
amout
of salary which
still
make
them struggle with poverty.
On the other hand
,
some
other disciplines such as tourism could provide alternative jobs which are permanent and stable.

Secondly
,
even though
the empty land can be
used
on agricultural purposes, it is
still
not a logical
idea
that should
be applied
. When the forest
is disappeared
, topsoil erosion may
increse
so
it will become unsuitable for raising cattle for any long period of time.
Furthermore
, the lack of trees may lead to air pollution and absence of protection
so
the crops can
be damaged
harshly
and unable to grow
steadily
.
Therefore
, the authority should take action to deal with the problem such as doing reformation, supporting the farmers with equipment,
ect
.

Finally
,
in spite of
some
benefits gained from woods, the rainforests should
be sustained
since they are
also
shelters for
many
species of flora and fauna. If deforestation occurs, animal populations will suffer dramatic losses when their natural habitat
is altered
.
Hence
, the loss of biological diversity will
also
rise
significantly
and lead to serious extinction of scarce plants. To
prevent
these potential situations, the
government
should enact laws of forest preservation to
keep
balance for the ecosystem.

In conclusion
, despite
some
possitive
sides, cutting down rainforests is an impractical
idea
because
of various drawbacks.
Besides
,
people
should
prevent
further
damage from deforestation by
stop
doing it and concentrate on restore spoiled areas.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Cutting down rainforests is a necessary evil. In many of the countries where rainforests are disappearing, the people are very poor. Logging the rainforests provides many jobs, which help these poorpeople. The loggers, the truck drivers, and the shippers all receive work because of the logging industry. As well, once the land is cleared it can be used for more productive things. Farmers can grow crops on the land and ranchers can raise cattle. Finally, the wood itself is very useful. People use the wood for housing, fuel, furniture, and many other everyday items

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
337 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: