There has been a significant rise in technologies; computers being one of them has successfully shown us its potential to do work errorless. With advancing computer skills and its production at a higher rate, it can jeopardize humans labour, yet with limited programs and a lack of logical decision-making skills, I think it is nearly impossible that it can completely replace humans.
The evolvement of computers have swiftly escalated and have endangered humans' occupation. Not only computers can work tirelessly without losing efficiency and high accuracy, but they also cut labour cost. Moreover, they can store a large amount of data in a single chip and can find and edit them in future. For example, jobs that are done repetitive and straightforward can be easily replaced by computers. For the above reasons, computers can outsource humans, which can adversely risk a human job's workforce.
On the other hand, though computers are smart and intelligent, they need manual assistance, which a humans logic can only achieve. Secondly, complex work with different activities required cannot be done by a computer. In addition, the major skills to peak at work are networking, and communication and humans can fulfil that. Furthermore, Some jobs require an emotional connection, like the jobs of nurses and teachers. Hence computers will drastically fail by doing it. Due to all these points, with operating and monitoring required is highly unlikely that computers can overpower humans.
With improving technologies and artificial intelligence in computers, it may have stolen many jobs, but its needs for assisting declines its rates to replace the human workforce. This essay discussed how it is not possible for computers to replace humans
There has been a significant rise in technologies; computers being one of them has
successfully
shown us its potential to do
work
errorless. With advancing computer
skills
and its production at a higher rate, it can jeopardize
humans
labour
,
yet
with limited programs and a lack of logical decision-making
skills
, I
think
it is
nearly
impossible that it can completely replace humans.
The
evolvement
of computers
have
swiftly
escalated and have endangered humans' occupation. Not
only
computers can
work
tirelessly
without losing efficiency and high accuracy,
but
they
also
cut
labour
cost.
Moreover
, they can store a large amount of data in a single chip and can find and edit them
in future
.
For example
,
jobs
that
are done
repetitive and straightforward can be
easily
replaced by computers. For the above reasons, computers can outsource
humans
, which can
adversely
risk
a
human
job's workforce.
On the other hand
, though computers are smart and intelligent, they need manual assistance, which a
humans
logic can
only
achieve.
Secondly
, complex
work
with
different
activities required cannot
be done
by a computer.
In addition
, the major
skills
to peak at
work
are networking, and communication and
humans
can fulfil that.
Furthermore
,
Some
jobs
require an emotional connection, like the
jobs
of nurses and teachers.
Hence
computers will
drastically
fail by doing it. Due to all these points, with operating and monitoring required is
highly
unlikely that computers can overpower humans.
With improving technologies and artificial intelligence in computers, it may have stolen
many
jobs
,
but
its needs for assisting declines its rates to replace the
human
workforce. This essay discussed how it is not possible for computers to replace
humans