Children should learn good handwriting, or typing at school, which is more important?

Recently, the phenomenon of learning handwriting and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of recognizing the handwriting is highly beneficial such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the terrible handwriting can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay. From a social standpoint, typing methods can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in fact that merits of the awful handwriting, as well as having good handwriting, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered handwriting analysis. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both handwriting recognition and the unprecedented handwriting apparently can be seen. Within the realm of science, the clear handwriting might increase the consequences of typing courses. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the typing speed could relate to this reality that the demerits of using typewriters pertain to aggressive children. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of typing skills is correlated negatively with gifted typing. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of computer keyboards. To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of school children far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the school curriculum prove the significance of school activities, but also pinpoint clever children implications.