Both the reading and the speaker talk about the painting known as " Portrait of an Elderly woman in a white bonnet" , which is paintated by rembrandt. The former was not agreed that this painting done by the rembrandt while the lateral provides several resons to supports that this done by rembrandt.
To begin with, the reading states that the woman's dress in the portrit is inconsistent. The reading notes that woman is wearing white line cap which mostly servant were which is not the rembrandt style of paintaing. On the other hand, the speaker says that the x-rays and the analysis of the colour of the paintaing revels that this white line was added 100 years later to the original paintaing. He also mentions that this was done to increase the value of the paintaing.
Moreover, the passage contends that painting light and shadow was the style of the rembrandt and this painting does not show that. However, the professor says that original painting was simple color cloth which reflect the light on the face, so this painting belongs to rembrandt.
Furthermore, the article contends that painting was done on several pieces of wood which is glued together. Auther's opinion is that rembrandt only does paintaing on the single wood panel. Once again the speaker was not agree. He explains that original painting was done on the single wood only, later some one added small wood to look attractive. in addition, the examination of the wood revels that it was made from the tree which rembrandt mostly use for his painting. 
Both the reading and the speaker talk about the  
painting
 known as  
"
; Portrait of an Elderly woman in a white  
bonnet"
; 
 ,
 which is  
paintated
 by  
rembrandt
. The former was not  
agreed
 that this  
painting
 done by the  
rembrandt
 while the lateral provides several  
resons
 to supports that this done by  
rembrandt
.
To  
begin
 with, the reading states that the woman's dress in the  
portrit
 is inconsistent. The reading notes that woman is wearing white line cap which  
mostly
 servant were which is not the  
rembrandt
 style of  
paintaing
.  
On the other hand
, the speaker says that the x-rays and the analysis of the  
colour
 of the  
paintaing
 revels that this white line was  
added
 100 years later to the original  
paintaing
. He  
also
 mentions that this  
was done
 to increase the value of the  
paintaing
. 
Moreover
, the passage contends that  
painting
 light and shadow was the style of the  
rembrandt
 and this  
painting
 does not  
show
 that.  
However
, the professor says that original  
painting
 was simple color cloth which reflect the light on the face,  
so
 this  
painting
 belongs to  
rembrandt
. 
Furthermore
, the article contends that  
painting
  was done
 on several pieces of  
wood
 which  
is glued
 together.  
Auther
's opinion is that  
rembrandt
  only
 does  
paintaing
 on the single  
wood
 panel.  
Once
 again the speaker was not  
agree
. He  
explains
 that original  
painting
  was done
 on the single  
wood
  only
, later  
some one
  added
  small
  wood
 to look attractive.  
in
 addition, the examination of the  
wood
 revels that it  
was made
 from the tree which  
rembrandt
  mostly
  use
 for his  
painting
.