Both the reading and the speaker talk about the painting known as " Portrait of an Elderly woman in a white bonnet" , which is paintated by rembrandt. The former was not agreed that this painting done by the rembrandt while the lateral provides several resons to supports that this done by rembrandt.
To begin with, the reading states that the woman's dress in the portrit is inconsistent. The reading notes that woman is wearing white line cap which mostly servant were which is not the rembrandt style of paintaing. On the other hand, the speaker says that the x-rays and the analysis of the colour of the paintaing revels that this white line was added 100 years later to the original paintaing. He also mentions that this was done to increase the value of the paintaing.
Moreover, the passage contends that painting light and shadow was the style of the rembrandt and this painting does not show that. However, the professor says that original painting was simple color cloth which reflect the light on the face, so this painting belongs to rembrandt.
Furthermore, the article contends that painting was done on several pieces of wood which is glued together. Auther's opinion is that rembrandt only does paintaing on the single wood panel. Once again the speaker was not agree. He explains that original painting was done on the single wood only, later some one added small wood to look attractive. in addition, the examination of the wood revels that it was made from the tree which rembrandt mostly use for his painting.
Both the reading and the speaker talk about the
painting
known as
"
; Portrait of an Elderly woman in a white
bonnet"
;
,
which is
paintated
by
rembrandt
. The former was not
agreed
that this
painting
done by the
rembrandt
while the lateral provides several
resons
to supports that this done by
rembrandt
.
To
begin
with, the reading states that the woman's dress in the
portrit
is inconsistent. The reading notes that woman is wearing white line cap which
mostly
servant were which is not the
rembrandt
style of
paintaing
.
On the other hand
, the speaker says that the x-rays and the analysis of the
colour
of the
paintaing
revels that this white line was
added
100 years later to the original
paintaing
. He
also
mentions that this
was done
to increase the value of the
paintaing
.
Moreover
, the passage contends that
painting
light and shadow was the style of the
rembrandt
and this
painting
does not
show
that.
However
, the professor says that original
painting
was simple color cloth which reflect the light on the face,
so
this
painting
belongs to
rembrandt
.
Furthermore
, the article contends that
painting
was done
on several pieces of
wood
which
is glued
together.
Auther
's opinion is that
rembrandt
only
does
paintaing
on the single
wood
panel.
Once
again the speaker was not
agree
. He
explains
that original
painting
was done
on the single
wood
only
, later
some one
added
small
wood
to look attractive.
in
addition, the examination of the
wood
revels that it
was made
from the tree which
rembrandt
mostly
use
for his
painting
.