Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Both reading and listening are about the number of birds in the United State

Both reading and listening are about the number of birds in the United State RNrOQ

Both reading and listening are about the number of birds in the United State. Whereas the reading claims that the number of birds will necessarily decline, and gives three supporting reasons. The listening disagree with this claim, and cast doubt on each reason. To start with, according to the passage, the increase of the human population and sattlement would decrease the the traditional areas suitable for birds. However, the lecturer finds this argument un convencing. She explains how the birds have now better and larger habitats. While some birds' number decrease, other kinds of birds' number increases. Then she gives some examples of these birds like falcon Secondly, according to the author, the increase in agricultural activities also have the same effect on the birds habitats. As a result, the birds populations in the rural areas will continue to decline. But the professor challengs this by saying that this is might happening, but not the way mention in the passage. Nowadays, new technology used to increase the efficiency of the land to produce more per land. So, no need to expand the lands. Finally, according to the reading, the pesticidal will effecting the birds by eaither killing them, or effecting their reproducing. In contrast, the lecturer says that this is incorrect projection of the history to the future. Now, two new strategies are used to protect the birds: using less toxic material and developing more pesticial resistance crops, which do not harm the birds at all.

Both reading and listening are about the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsumtotalfigurestatistic
number
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfowl
birds
 in the United State. Whereas the reading claims that the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsumtotalfigurestatistic
number
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfowl
birds
 will necessarily
 decline, and gives three supporting reasons. The listening disagree with this claim, and cast doubt on each reason.

To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiate
start
 with, according to the passage, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdevelopmentraisemergerhikeriseupsurge
increase
 of the human population and Possible spelling mistake found.settlementbattlement
sattlement
 would decrease Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only "the" or "the" is left.the
the the
 traditional areas suitable for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfowl
birds
. However
, the lecturer finds this argument Possible spelling mistake found.UNinonanupus
un
Possible spelling mistake found.convincingconvening
convencing
. She This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :interprets
explains
 how the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfowl
birds
 have This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :nowadays
now
 better and larger habitats. While This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 birds' You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsumtotalfigurestatistic
number
 decrease, other kinds of birds' You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsumtotalfigurestatistic
number
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdevelopmentraisemergerhikeriseupsurge
increases
. Then she gives This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 examples of these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfowl
birds
 like Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraphfalcon.falcon!falcon?falcon:falcon,falcon;
falcon


Secondly
, according to the author, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdevelopmentraisemergerhikeriseupsurge
increase
 in agricultural activities also
 have the same effect on the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfowl
birds
 habitats. As a result
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfowl
birds
 populations in the rural areas will continue to decline. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
But
 the professor Possible spelling mistake found.challengechallenges
challengs
 this by saying that this is might happening, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 not the way mention in the passage. Nowadays, new technology This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdevelopmentraisemergerhikeriseupsurge
increase
 the efficiency of the land to produce more per land. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
So
, no need to expand the lands.

Finally
, according to the reading, the Possible spelling mistake found.pesticidepesticides
pesticidal
 will effecting the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfowl
birds
 by Possible spelling mistake found.either
eaither
 killing them, or effecting their reproducing. In contrast
, the lecturer says that this is incorrect projection of the history to the future. This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :nowadays
Now
, two new strategies are This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 to protect the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfowl
birds
: using less toxic material and developing more Possible spelling mistake found.pesticidevestigial
pesticial
 resistance crops, which do not harm the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfowl
birds
 at all. 