It is true that the world’s largest companies are located in large cities. In the city many people expect to It is true that the world’s largest companies are located in large cities. In the city many people expect to find better employment opportunities, often with bigger, secure companies. As cities become overcrowded, problems relating to housing and transport arise, because of which some people suggest that the larger companies should relocate to the countryside. While this may have some advantages, I firmly believe that the disadvantages would be far more than the advantages.
It is reasonable to think that moving thousands of employees from large companies out to remote areas would have a positive impact on the overcrowding of some cities. There would be less traffic because of less people in the city centre, and this would obviously be highly desirable. In addition, there would be less strain on the services offered by the city – banks, public transportation, restaurants and the like. This would mean a reduction in queues and faster customer service. To add to it, housing would also become affordable. It is generally seen that because of too many people wanting to live in the city, land prices and even rents of houses start touching the sky.
The problem however would be that a dramatic reduction in numbers of people in the cities would mean that many businesses would go broke. Restaurants, cafes and other service areas would suffer tremendously. What would happen is that overcrowding would occur where the new, large organisations relocate. More and more people offering services would spring up – restaurants, shopping centres and other businesses would be needed to serve the increasingly larger numbers of people who moved to the area. In addition, the rural area may not be able to provide the enormous quantities of housing, electricity and raw materials required to run a huge company.
Furthermore, relocating businesses to rural areas may upset many households. Children also may have to change schools. So it would not be practical to do so. Transport and accommodation problems in cities need to be sorted out by connecting the villages and cities by very efficient public transport, so that people come to work in the cities and live in rural areas. Newer businesses should be encouraged to open in the suburbs; the already existing ones should continue to be where they already are.
To sum up, relocating the companies would assist with the overcrowding problem in some cities. However, a new set of problems would surface, which would be far more than the benefits. Therefore, I reiterate my point that the idea of moving larger corporations out to rural areas would not be beneficial. 
It is true that the world’s largest  
companies
  are located
 in  
large
  cities
. In the city  
many
  people
  expect
 to It is true that the world’s largest  
companies
  are located
 in  
large
  cities
. In the city  
many
  people
  expect
 to find better employment opportunities,  
often
 with bigger, secure  
companies
. As  
cities
 become overcrowded,  
problems
 relating to housing and transport arise,  
because
 of which  
some
  people
 suggest that the larger  
companies
 should relocate to the countryside. While this may have  
some
 advantages, I  
firmly
 believe that the disadvantages would be far more than the advantages.
It is reasonable to  
think
 that moving thousands of employees from  
large
  companies
 out to remote  
areas
 would have a  
positive
 impact on the overcrowding of  
some
  cities
. There would be less traffic  
because
 of  
less
  people
 in the city  
centre
, and this would  
obviously
 be  
highly
 desirable.  
In addition
, there would be less strain on the  
services
 offered by the city  
–
 banks, public transportation, restaurants and the like. This would mean a reduction in queues and faster customer  
service
. To  
add
 to it, housing would  
also
 become affordable. It is  
generally
  seen
 that  
because
 of too  
many
  people
 wanting to  
live
 in the city, land prices and even rents of  
houses
  start
 touching the sky.
The  
problem
  however
 would be that a dramatic reduction in numbers of  
people
 in the  
cities
 would mean that  
many
  businesses
 would go broke. Restaurants,  
cafes
 and other  
service
  areas
 would suffer  
tremendously
. What would happen is that overcrowding would occur where the new,  
large
  organisations
 relocate. More and more  
people
 offering  
services
 would spring up  
–
 restaurants, shopping  
centres
 and other  
businesses
 would  
be needed
 to serve the  
increasingly
 larger numbers of  
people
 who  
moved
 to the  
area
.  
In addition
, the  
rural
  area
 may not be able to provide the enormous quantities of housing, electricity and raw materials required to run a huge  
company
. 
Furthermore
, relocating  
businesses
 to  
rural
  areas
 may upset  
many
 households. Children  
also
 may  
have to
  change
 schools.  
So
 it would not be practical to do  
so
. Transport and accommodation  
problems
 in  
cities
 need to  
be sorted
 out by connecting the villages and  
cities
 by  
very
 efficient public transport,  
so
 that  
people
  come
 to work in the  
cities
 and  
live
 in  
rural
  areas
. Newer  
businesses
 should  
be encouraged
 to open in the suburbs; the already existing ones should continue to be where they already are.
To sum up, relocating the  
companies
 would assist with the overcrowding  
problem
 in  
some
  cities
.  
However
, a new set of  
problems
 would surface, which would be far more than the benefits.  
Therefore
, I reiterate my point that the  
idea
 of moving larger corporations out to  
rural
  areas
 would not be beneficial.