The article states that a ban action for fishing the menhaden fish is not the best solution and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that after rexamining the information in the passage, the ban is the right solution, and he refutes each of the Author's reasons.
First, the reading asserts that one of the factors that cause the decline in the number of menhaden fish is the large population of striped bass, which feed on menhaden. On the other hand, the professor contends that by activating the restriction on hunting the menhaden, we will keep the nature equilibrium, and the nature will keep the number of menhaden without decline.
Second, the reading posits that the ban will affect on all animals because menhaden is a main source of food for them. The professor opposes this point by saying that there are many species that can replace the menhaden as a food source. So, this ban will not affect on other animals seriously.
Third, the article claims that a lot of people will become unemployed after the fishing restrictions. However, the professor refutes this point by explaining that this will be a temporary situation. According to the professor, people who depend on fishing the menhaden will return back fishing, but only they need to change the type of fish they catch.
The article states that a
ban
action for
fishing
the menhaden fish is not the best solution and provides three reasons of support.
However
, the
professor
explains
that after
rexamining
the information in the passage, the
ban
is the right solution, and he refutes each of the Author's reasons.
First
, the reading asserts that one of the factors that cause the decline in the number of menhaden fish is the large population of striped bass, which feed on menhaden.
On the other hand
, the
professor
contends that by activating the restriction on hunting the menhaden, we will
keep
the nature equilibrium, and the nature will
keep
the number of menhaden without decline.
Second, the reading posits that the
ban
will
affect
on all animals
because
menhaden is a main source of food for them. The
professor
opposes this point by saying that there are
many
species that can replace the menhaden as a food source.
So
, this
ban
will not
affect
on other animals
seriously
.
Third, the article claims that
a lot of
people
will become unemployed after the
fishing
restrictions.
However
, the
professor
refutes this point by explaining that this will be a temporary situation. According to the
professor
,
people
who depend on
fishing
the menhaden will
return back
fishing
,
but
only
they need to
change
the type of fish they catch.