The given bar graphs depict the comparison between distinct trash products accumulated by a reusable center from 2011 to 2015.
From an overall prospective, in all five years, the maximum paper garbage was collected by remarking center. The least trash was accumulated from garden. In all years, the amount of garbage had been fluctuated.
As apparent from the diagram, in 2011 to 2014, the amount of paper trash was fluctuated; by 2015, it rose to the highest figure of 70 tonnes. However, the remarking center accumulated nearly, 45 tonnes of garbage of glass from 2011 to 2014; in 2015, the glass trash was rose to 52 tonnes.
It is further clear that from 2011 to 2015, the trash of tin was fluctuated in a zig zag manner; foremost, it was 35 tonnes; after, it was inclined to 39 tonnes. The least trash gathered from garden in 2012, only 15 tonnes. In 2015, the remarking center collected 35 tonnes garden waster; followed by, 32tonnes in 2011 and 31 tonnes in 2013.
The
given
bar graphs depict the comparison between distinct
trash
products accumulated by a reusable center from 2011 to 2015.
From an
overall
prospective, in all five years, the maximum paper garbage
was collected
by remarking center. The least
trash
was accumulated
from garden. In all years, the amount of garbage had
been fluctuated
.
As apparent from the diagram, in 2011 to 2014, the amount of paper
trash
was fluctuated
; by 2015, it rose to the highest figure of 70 tonnes.
However
, the remarking center accumulated
nearly
, 45 tonnes of garbage of glass from 2011 to 2014; in 2015, the glass
trash
was rose to 52 tonnes.
It is
further
clear
that from 2011 to 2015, the
trash
of tin
was fluctuated
in a
zig zag
manner; foremost, it was 35 tonnes; after, it
was inclined
to 39 tonnes. The least
trash
gathered from garden in 2012,
only
15 tonnes. In 2015, the remarking center collected 35 tonnes garden waster; followed by, 32tonnes in 2011 and 31 tonnes in 2013.