the pie charts compare the three countries namely Korea, Sweden and the UK in terms of different measures are used for each coutries of harmful waste treatment.
It is clear that the Republic of Korea is the country with the highest proportion of waste recycling. While underground is considered the most common use in both Sweden and the UK.
In the UK and Sweden, buried in harmful waste in the ground is the most common form of remove account for 82% and over a half of its waste treatment respectively. On the other part, Korea uses recycled as the main method of remove, making up approximately 70% of the total.
Sweden uses a 20% fire method for waste treatment tiwce mora than in Korea a massive 9% burn approach but just 2% of waste harmful buried in the UK. As for the two new methods are not used in Korea and Sweden, stands at 8% each, chemical appearance and dumping at the sea in UK, whereas there are just three main treatments in the other two countries.
the
pie charts compare the three countries
namely
Korea, Sweden and the UK in terms of
different
measures are
used
for each
coutries
of harmful
waste
treatment.
It is
clear
that the Republic of Korea is the country with the highest proportion of
waste
recycling. While underground
is considered
the most common
use
in both Sweden and the UK.
In the UK and Sweden, buried in harmful
waste
in the ground is the most common form of remove account for 82% and over a half of its
waste
treatment
respectively
. On the other part, Korea
uses
recycled as the main method of remove, making up approximately 70% of the total.
Sweden
uses
a 20% fire method for
waste
treatment
tiwce
mora
than in Korea a massive 9% burn approach
but
just
2% of
waste
harmful buried in the UK. As for the two new methods are not
used
in Korea and Sweden, stands at 8% each, chemical appearance and dumping at the sea in UK, whereas there are
just
three main treatments in the other two countries.