Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The table illustrates the findings of surveys that are filled by students for McGill University rating in different aspects, within three years ( 2005, 2010 and 2015). Overall, it can be seen that McGill University had maintained the highest standards for teaching quality and library resources, which were represented with the highest satisfaction percentages. Although students were the least satisfied with the range of modules offered. From the students’ point of view, McGill University had provided them with the best library resources and teaching quality which were represented with (86-87%) and (72-78%) respectively. Moreover, only half of the students were convenient with the student’s services in 2005, but it improved significantly over the next ten years to reach the satisfaction of almost all of them. On the other hand, McGill University was not providing students with a variety of resources, so as a result, it received the lowest rating of 39% in 2005, and surprisingly this

The table illustrates the findings of surveys that are filled by students for McGill University rating in different aspects, within three years ( 2005, 2010 and 2015). Overall, it can be seen that McGill University had maintained the highest standards for teaching quality and library resources, which were represented with the highest satisfaction percentages. Although students were the least satisfied with the range of modules offered. From the students’ point of view, McGill University had provided them with the best library resources and teaching quality which were represented with (86-87%) and (72-78%) respectively. Moreover, only half of the students were convenient with the student’s services in 2005, but it improved significantly over the next ten years to reach the satisfaction of almost all of them. On the other hand, McGill University was not providing students with a variety of resources, so as a result, it received the lowest rating of 39% in 2005, and surprisingly this QL2Wb
The table illustrates the findings of surveys that are filled by students for McGill University rating in different aspects, within three years ( 2005, 2010 and 2015). Overall, it can be seen that McGill University had maintained the highest standards for teaching quality and library resources, which were represented with the highest satisfaction percentages. Although students were the least satisfied with the range of modules offered. From the students’ point of view, McGill University had provided them with the best library resources and teaching quality which were represented with (86-87%) and (72-78%) respectively. Moreover, only half of the students were convenient with the student’s services in 2005, but it improved significantly over the next ten years to reach the satisfaction of almost all of them. On the other hand, McGill University was not providing students with a variety of resources, so as a result, it received the lowest rating of 39% in 2005, and surprisingly this result dropped to almost half by the last year. Interestingly, sports and social facilities had received the exact rating for the three years which was 65%, suggesting that these services were convenient for almost half of students only and it was not improved whatsoever.
The table illustrates the findings of surveys that
are filled
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
for McGill
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
University
rating in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
aspects, within three years
Don't put a space after the opening parenthesis
(
2005, 2010 and 2015).

Overall
, it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that McGill
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
University
had maintained the highest standards for teaching quality and library resources, which
were represented
with the highest satisfaction percentages.
“Although” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Although
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
were the least satisfied with the range of modules offered.

From the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students’
point of view, McGill
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
University
had provided them with the best library resources and teaching quality which
were represented
with (86-87%) and (72-78%)
respectively
.
Moreover
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
half of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
were convenient with the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
student’s
services in 2005,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improved
significantly
over the
next
ten years to reach the satisfaction of almost all of them.

On the other hand
, McGill
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
University
was not providing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
with a variety of resources,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
as a result
, it received the lowest rating of 39% in 2005, and
surprisingly
this result dropped to almost half by the last
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
.
Interestingly
, sports and social facilities had received the exact rating for the three years which was 65%, suggesting that these services were convenient for almost half of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
and it was not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improved
whatsoever.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The table illustrates the findings of surveys that are filled by students for McGill University rating in different aspects, within three years ( 2005, 2010 and 2015). Overall, it can be seen that McGill University had maintained the highest standards for teaching quality and library resources, which were represented with the highest satisfaction percentages. Although students were the least satisfied with the range of modules offered. From the students’ point of view, McGill University had provided them with the best library resources and teaching quality which were represented with (86-87%) and (72-78%) respectively. Moreover, only half of the students were convenient with the student’s services in 2005, but it improved significantly over the next ten years to reach the satisfaction of almost all of them. On the other hand, McGill University was not providing students with a variety of resources, so as a result, it received the lowest rating of 39% in 2005, and surprisingly this

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
200 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The table illustrates the findings of surveys that are filled by students for McGill University rating in different aspects, within three years ( 2005, 2010 and 2015). Overall, it can be seen that McGill University had maintained the highest standards for teaching quality and library resources, which were represented with the highest satisfaction percentages. Although students were the least satisfied with the range of modules offered. From the students’ point of view, McGill University had provided them with the best library resources and teaching quality which were represented with (86-87%) and (72-78%) respectively. Moreover, only half of the students were convenient with the student’s services in 2005, but it improved significantly over the next ten years to reach the satisfaction of almost all of them. On the other hand, McGill University was not providing students with a variety of resources, so as a result, it received the lowest rating of 39% in 2005, and surprisingly this