Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The table below shows THE WATER cost in australia in 2004

The table below shows THE WATER cost in australia in 2004 QwbEx
The given table compares the cost of water consumption and average household water bill in five separated cities in Australia in 2004. Obviously, there was a majorvast difference between the figure ofamount of money people who paid for water usage up to 125 kiloliters (KL) and using more than 125 kiloliters in Adelaide and Perth, while the water pricing in other cities remained unchanged. Regarding the price of using water up to 125 KL, both citizens in Adelaide and Perth reached the lowest data, just spent $0, 42. When water usage exceeded 125 KL, the expense of dwellers in Adelaide and Perth soared dramatically, payinghad a larger amount number than Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney, about $1, 00 and $1, 50 respectively. By contrast, the consumption of water up to 125KL in Sydney was charged the highest ($0, 98), followed by Brisbane ($0, 84) and Melbourne ($0, 78). There was no difference in water use over 125KL of these three cities. With respect toIn household water bill, people in Perth paidwas the highest ($332), while Melbourne was charged the least, about $253. Those (thay cho water bills) for iInhabitants in Adelaide, Brisbane and Sydney were from $310 to $319.
The
given
table compares the cost of
water
consumption and average household
water
bill in five separated cities in Australia in 2004.

Obviously
, there was a
majorvast
difference between the figure
ofamount
of money
people
who paid for
water
usage up to 125 kiloliters (KL) and using more than 125 kiloliters in Adelaide and Perth, while the
water
pricing in other cities remained unchanged.

Regarding the price of using
water
up to 125 KL, both citizens in Adelaide and Perth reached the lowest data,
just
spent $0, 42. When
water
usage exceeded 125 KL, the expense of dwellers in Adelaide and Perth soared
dramatically
,
payinghad
a larger amount number than Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney, about $1, 00 and $1, 50
respectively
.

By contrast, the consumption of
water
up to 125KL in Sydney
was charged
the highest ($0, 98), followed by Brisbane ($0, 84) and Melbourne ($0, 78). There was no difference in
water
use
over 125KL of these three cities. With respect
toIn
household
water
bill,
people
in Perth
paidwas
the highest ($332), while Melbourne
was charged
the least, about $253. Those (
thay
cho
water
bills) for
iInhabitants
in Adelaide, Brisbane and Sydney were from $310 to $319.

IELTS academic The table below shows THE WATER cost in australia in 2004

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
198 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts
  • The table below show the waster cost of Australian
    The given table compares the cost of water consumption and average household water bill in five separated cities in Australia in 2004. Obviously, there was a majorvast difference between the figure ofamount of money people who paid for water usage up to 125 kiloliters (KL) and using more than 125 k...
  • the table shows the changes in modes of travel in a European country between 1995 and 2005, it also shows a projection to the year 2025.
    The table offers insights into the data of the vehicles in a European country over the period from 1995 to 2005 and predicts in 2025. It is evident that the buck proportion will go to in 2025, while the opposite was true of 1995. As far as the statistics on the table are concerned, in 1995, there ...
  • causes of worldwide land degradation
    The pie chart shows us why the agriculture land has become. Less productive, and how it and how it affected the three regions, namely, north America, Europe, Oceania. Overall, the most region that got affected was Europe and the least affected was north America. In 1990 the north America was affect...
  • member in collge clubsdddd
    The bar chart provides information about the proportion of students members in college clubs in one year 2012 for both gender. Overall, the chat clearly evident that the highest section was engineering for men while the lowest one was education. by contrast, the greatest one was education with girl...
  • You can watch a video tutorial on how to describe bar charts in IELTS Academic Writing task 1:
    The bar chart provides information about the percentages of divorces in Finland and Sweden between 2011 and 2015. Overall, Sweden experienced a downward trend, while Finland showed an upward trend throughout the period. Both countries’ divorce rates had some fluctuations. Although Finland initially...
  • The graph gives information on the popularity of three subjects at a regional university between 1960 and 2020.
    The Line graph illustrates the data on the proportion of students enrolled in three different courses( Humanities, Science, and Medicine ) at a local university from 1960 to 2020. Overall, the number of pupils enrolled in humanities has drastically decreased whereas, students enroll in medicine has...





Get more results for topic: