Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.

The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. Qj6w
The table gives information about poverty rates among six types of household in Australia in the year 1999. It is noticeable that levels of poverty were higher for single people than for couples, and people with children were more likely to be poor than those without. Poverty rates were considerably lower among elderly people. Overall, 11% of Australians, or 1, 837, 000 people, were living in poverty in 1999. Aged people were the least likely to be poor, with poverty levels of 6% and 4% for single aged people and aged couples respectively. Just over one fifth of single parents were living in poverty, whereas only 12% of parents living with a partner were classed as poor. The same pattern can be seen for people with no children: while 19% of single people in this group were living below the poverty line, the figure for couples was much lower, at only 7%.
The table gives information about
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
rates among six types of household in Australia in the year 1999.

It is noticeable that levels of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
were higher for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
single
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
than for couples, and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
with children were more likely to be poor than those without.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Poverty
rates were
considerably
lower among elderly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
.

Overall
, 11% of Australians, or 1, 837, 000
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
, were
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
living
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
in 1999. Aged
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
were the least likely to be poor, with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
levels of 6% and 4% for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
single
aged
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
and aged couples
respectively
.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Just
over one fifth of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
single
parents were
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
living
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
, whereas
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
12% of parents
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
living
with a partner
were classed
as poor. The same pattern can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
with no children: while 19% of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
single
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
in this group were
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
living
below the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
line, the figure for couples was much lower, at
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
7%.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
152 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.