Overall, the criticism dominantly came from the public, and the authorities’ problem-solving efficiency was represented by a fluctuation, though the final result was an improvement.
Regarding the cause of dissatisfaction, it is clear that the public accounted for 63% of the complaints, which made it the prime root of negative feedback. Both government agencies and state outsiders contributed to the data with similar figures (around 10% to 11%), which put the former at second place and the latter at third rank. In a similar vein, insurance companies’ complaining rate was only 2% less than that of the out-of-state sector. Finally, media (3%), bank employees (3%), and other sources of criticism (2%) summed up for a proportion of 8%.
Meanwhile, the authorities’ response to the complaints had varied moderately in terms of the time spent per year for 5 years. In 2000, it took slightly under 6 months for the leaders to analyze and handle the situation. 1 year later, this process’s efficiency showed a reduction as the amount of time increased to precisely 6 months. However, the figure underwent a stabilization in the next 3 years, and it eventually declined to roughly 4 months in 2004.
Overall
, the criticism
dominantly
came from the public, and the authorities’ problem-solving efficiency
was represented
by a fluctuation, though the final result was an improvement.
Regarding the cause of dissatisfaction, it is
clear
that the public accounted for 63% of the complaints, which made it the prime root of
negative
feedback. Both
government
agencies and state outsiders contributed to the data with similar figures (around 10% to 11%), which put the former at second place and the latter at third rank. In a similar vein, insurance
companies
’ complaining rate was
only
2% less than that of the out-of-state sector.
Finally
, media (3%), bank employees (3%), and other sources of criticism (2%) summed up for a proportion of 8%.
Meanwhile, the authorities’ response to the complaints had varied
moderately
in terms of the time spent per
year
for 5 years. In 2000, it took
slightly
under 6 months for the leaders to analyze and handle the situation. 1
year
later, this process’s efficiency
showed
a reduction as the amount of time increased to
precisely
6 months.
However
, the figure underwent a stabilization in the
next
3 years, and it
eventually
declined to roughly 4 months in 2004.