Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000

The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 xR7w
The given four circular charts compare the units of electricity which were produced by fuel sources, namely coal, oil, Natural gas, hydro power and Nuclear power in two nations Australia and France from 1980 to 2000. Overall, it can be clearly seen from the pie charts that the production of electricity from coal and hydro power was increasing, while it decreased in case of oil and natural gas over the given time period in Australia. In contrast, the generation of electricity from nuclear power was inclining and the figures of natural gas and hydropower were reducing throughout the time period. Getting into details, in the year of 1980, only 50 units were generated by coal, which climbed up by 80 units in 2000 year in Australia. Moreover, one tenth units oil was produced in 1980 and it sharply went down to 2 units after two decades. Futhermore, a similar trend was observed from Natural gas and hydropower both were at 20 units in 1980. while natural gas declined by 18 units, hydropower escalated to 36 units in the last year. Conversely, in the case of France country, the production of electricity from coal was equal at 25 units in both years and the production of oil source grew from 20 units in 1980 to 25 units in 2000. In addition, in 1980, above one tenth units of electricity was produced by nuclear power and 126 units were generated in 2000. It was highest as compared to 1980.
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
four circular charts compare the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
which
were produced
by fuel sources,
namely
coal,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Natural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gas
, hydro
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
and Nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
in two nations Australia and France from 1980 to 2000.
Overall
, it can be
clearly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
from the pie charts that the production of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
from coal and hydro
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
was increasing, while it decreased in case of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
natural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gas
over the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
time period in Australia.
In contrast
, the generation of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
from nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
was inclining and the figures of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
natural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gas
and hydropower were reducing throughout the time period. Getting into
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
details
, in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
of 1980,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
50
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
were generated
by coal, which climbed up by 80
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
in 2000
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
in Australia.
Moreover
, one tenth
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
was produced
in 1980 and it
sharply
went down to 2
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
after two decades.
Possible spelling mistake found.
Futhermore
, a similar trend
was observed
from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Natural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gas
and hydropower both were at 20
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
in 1980.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
while
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
natural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
gas
declined by 18
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
, hydropower escalated to 36
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
in the last
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
.
Conversely
, in the case of France country, the production of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
from coal was equal at 25
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
in both years and the production of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
oil
source grew from 20
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
in 1980 to 25
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
in 2000.
In addition
, in 1980, above one tenth
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electricity
was produced
by nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
and 126
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
units
were generated
in 2000. It was highest as compared to 1980.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000

Academic
  American English
1 paragraphs
247 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000