Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.

The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. ow1g

The pie charts give data on pieces of electricity consumption by fuel origin in Australia and France from 1980 to 2000. Overall, coal showed the highest production, while the lowest amount was observed in oil in Australia. Furthermore, nuclear power reached the highest peak, whereas hydro power accounted for the minimum quantity over a 20 years period. In detail, at the beginning the amount of coal made up 50 units, then increased more than 2 times for the next 20 years in Australia. This indicator for hydro power was equal to one fifth in 1980, afterwards this figure went up to 36 units in 2000. Oil and natural gas constituted 10 and 20 units respectively, however both of them plummeted to 2 units. The total production changed from 100 to 170 units. Moreover, in France in 1980 the consumption of nuclear power was equal to 15 units, then this segment rocketed to 126 units in 2000. This figure for coal and natural gas maintained the same level and stood at a quarter in 1980, however ths amount for coal remained static, while natural gas dipped to 2 units which was equal to hydro power in 2000. The quantity for hydro power made up 5 units in 1980, while 20 units for oil at the beginning. At the end this figure increased to 25 units. Total production for France doubled (90 and 180 units).

The pie charts give data on pieces of electricity consumption by fuel origin in Australia and France from 1980 to 2000.

Overall
, coal This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstratedportrayedindicateddisplayed
showed
 the highest production, while the lowest amount was observed
 in oil in Australia. Furthermore
, nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 reached the highest peak, whereas hydro You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 accounted for the minimum quantity over a 20 years period.

In detail, at the beginning the amount of coal made up 50 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrewgroupsystementity
units
, then increased more than 2 times for the next
 20 years in Australia. This indicator for hydro You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 was equal to one fifth in 1980, afterwards this figure went up to 36 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrewgroupsystementity
units
 in 2000. Oil and natural gas constituted 10 and 20 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrewgroupsystementity
units
respectively
, however
 both of them plummeted to 2 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrewgroupsystementity
units
. The total production This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alteredadjusted
changed
 from 100 to 170 units.

Moreover
, in France in 1980 the consumption of nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 was equal to 15 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrewgroupsystementity
units
, then this segment rocketed to 126 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrewgroupsystementity
units
 in 2000. This figure for coal and natural gas maintained the same level and stood at a quarter in 1980, however
Possible spelling mistake found.THSthethisthusthoNHS
ths
 amount for coal remained static, while natural gas dipped to 2 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrewgroupsystementity
units
 which was equal to hydro You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 in 2000. The quantity for hydro You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
 made up 5 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrewgroupsystementity
units
 in 1980, while 20 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrewgroupsystementity
units
 for oil at the beginning. At the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :expiration
end
 this figure increased to 25 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrewgroupsystementity
units
. Total production for France doubled (90 and 180 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrewgroupsystementity
units)
. 