Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005.

The graphics compare the variety of energy production that is different in France between 1995 and 2005. As can be seen from the pie charts, in 1995, Nuclear energy stations experienced a downward trend, and it had faced a moderate increase at the end of the next decade. Similarly, coal production contributed a radical contribution and continued to go up by 2005. Looking at the highest rates, in 1995, coal, gas and petrol had captured massive proportions of the given data by 29. 80%, 29. 63%, and 29. 27% respectively, and these figures except petrol sector kept up to improve their percentages to just 30. 31% and 30. 93% separately. In contrast for this, the exponential decrease of petrol segment had been seen, albeit by a hefty 10%, in 2005. Although nuclear(6. 40%) and other(4. 90%) types of energy bases accounted for mere parts, these indicators had seen a significant jump as 10. 10% for nuclear energy production and 9. 10% for other ones after a period of 10 years.

The graphics compare the variety of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 production that is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 in France between 1995 and 2005.

As can be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
seen
 from the pie charts, in 1995, Nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 stations experienced a downward trend, and it had faced a moderate increase at the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :expiration
end
 of the next
 decade. Similarly
, coal production contributed a radical contribution and continued to go up by 2005.

Looking at the highest rates, in 1995, coal, gas and petrol had captured massive proportions of the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
 data by 29. 80%, 29. 63%, and 29. 27% respectively
, and these figures except petrol sector This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :retained
kept
 up to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :ameliorate
improve
 their percentages to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 30. 31% and 30. 93% separately
. In Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?contrast,
contrast
 for this, the exponential decrease of petrol segment had been This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
seen
, albeit by a hefty 10%, in 2005.

Although nuclear(6. 40%) and other(4. 90%) types of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 bases accounted for mere parts, these indicators had This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
seen
 a significant jump as 10. 10% for nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 production and 9. 10% for other ones after a period of 10 years. 