Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016.

The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016. B12w

The pie charts illustrate the amount of revenue and expenditures for the charity of children in the USA in 2016. The total amount is shown in dollars whereas sources and recipients are mentioned in percentages. Overall, it is clear that revenue was greater than expenditures. Moreover, the quantity from food donation was the highest, and the amount from government and income investment was the lowest and exactly similar to each other. However, the charity was receiving through services programs were the most while it was the least through fundraising. In terms of total revenue and expenditure, the total revenue was $53, 561, 580, and the total expenditure was $53, 224, 896. Regarding revenue sources, food donation was the greatest and constituted to the very large majority while community contribution was only 10. 4%, and it was far lower than food. The figures from the remaining sources were contained an insignificant amount. Moreover, the government granted 0. 2% which was exactly similar to income investment. By contrast, children were receiving a very large majority of charity from program services whilst fundraising and management and the general were only contributed to 2. 6% and 1. 6%.

The pie charts illustrate the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withloadbulkextentsupplychunknumber
amount
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalaryreturnwealthcreditpayreceipt
revenue
 and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditures
 for the charity of children in the USA in 2016. The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withentireoutrightfulloverallunlimitedsheer
total
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withloadbulkextentsupplychunknumber
amount
is shown
 in dollars whereas sources and recipients are mentioned
 in percentages.

Overall
, it is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalaryreturnwealthcreditpayreceipt
revenue
 was greater than You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditures
. Moreover
, the quantity from food donation was the highest, and the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withloadbulkextentsupplychunknumber
amount
 from This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 and income investment was the lowest and exactly similar to each other. However
, the charity was receiving through services programs were the most while it was the least through fundraising.

In terms of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withentireoutrightfulloverallunlimitedsheer
total
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalaryreturnwealthcreditpayreceipt
revenue
 and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditure
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withentireoutrightfulloverallunlimitedsheer
total
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalaryreturnwealthcreditpayreceipt
revenue
 was $53, 561, 580, and the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withentireoutrightfulloverallunlimitedsheer
total
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditure
 was $53, 224, 896. Regarding You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalaryreturnwealthcreditpayreceipt
revenue
 sources, food donation was the greatest and constituted to the This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
 large majority while community contribution was This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 10. 4%, and it was far lower than food. The figures from the remaining sources were contained
 an insignificant You use this word too often, consider replacing it withloadbulkextentsupplychunknumber
amount
. Moreover
, the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 granted 0. 2% which was exactly similar to income investment.

By contrast, children were receiving a This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
 large majority of charity from program services whilst fundraising and management and the general were This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 contributed to 2. 6% and 1. 6%. 