Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

the pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive.the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relavant

the pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. lGxQ
The main purpose of the pie chart is to provide information about the reasons that are responsible for the less productive agricultural lands. By the way, the table depicts how these reasons affected the three regions of the world i. e. North America, Europe and Oceania during the 1990s. Firstly, we can observe from the pie chart that overgrazing occupied most of the portion, deforestation with 5 per cent less than overgrazing and almost a quarter was occupied by over-cultivation. In detail, over-grazing was around 35 per cent of the total cause, deforestation is trailing behind with 30 per cent, over-cultivation with 28 per cent and other causes with 7 per cent. Secondly, from the table we can observe that total land degradation was topped by the region Europe, then Oceania and the least was North America. Besides, in particular, deforestation was the major cause of land degradation in the region of Europe with around 9. 8 per cent, later with over-cultivation of 7. 7 per cent and at last overgrazing with 5. 5 per cent. All in all, the European region was more affected than the other two regions, and North America was least affected with 5 per cent. The percentage of land degraded by deforestation and overgrazing was least in North America with 0. 2 per cent and 1. 5 per cent respectively.
The main purpose of the pie chart is to provide information about the reasons that are responsible for the less productive agricultural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lands
. By the way, the table depicts how these reasons
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
affected
the three
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regions
of the world
There should be no space here: "i.e.".
i. e.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
North
America, Europe and Oceania during the 1990s.

Firstly
, we can observe from the pie chart that overgrazing occupied most of the portion,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
deforestation
with 5 per cent less than overgrazing and almost a quarter
was occupied
by over-cultivation. In detail, over-grazing was around 35 per cent of the total cause,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
deforestation
is trailing behind with 30 per cent, over-cultivation with 28 per cent and other causes with 7 per cent.

Secondly
, from the table we can observe that total
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
land
degradation
was topped
by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
region
Europe, then Oceania and the least was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
North
America.
Besides
,
in particular
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
deforestation
was the major cause of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
land
degradation in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
region
of Europe with around 9. 8 per cent, later with over-cultivation of 7. 7 per cent and at last overgrazing with 5. 5 per cent.

All in all, the European
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
region
was more
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
affected
than the other two
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
regions
, and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
North
America was least
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
affected
with 5 per cent. The percentage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
land
degraded by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
deforestation
and overgrazing was least in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
North
America with 0. 2 per cent and 1. 5 per cent
respectively
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic the pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
225 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • the pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive.the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relavant