Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The pie chart below show the engergy production in French from 1995 to 2005.

The pie chart below show the engergy production in French from 1995 to 2005. LbmMn
The pie charts above illustrate the difference in percentages of various types of energy production in France in the years 1995 and 2005. Generally, the production of gas and coal saw very minimal rises between the two years. However, on one hand, nuclear and other kinds of energy production had considerable increases; on the other hand, the production of petrol experienced a dramatic fall between 1995 and 2005. In 1995, coal had the highest percentage of energy production, standing at 29. 80%, with the runner-ups being gas (29. 63%) and petrol (29. 27%). In contrast, other kinds of energy production had the lowest percentage (4. 90%), with nuclear energy production falling short of this figure by about 1. 5%. By 2005, some figures had notable changes. Coal and gas production percentages barely shifted between the two years (30. 93% and 30. 31%, respectively). Similarly, nuclear and other types of energy production saw modest rises by 2005 (3. 7% and 4. 2%, respectively). However, petrol production went through a substantial drop of approximately 9. 75% down to 19. 55%. Despite these fluctuations, coal production figures remained the highest depicted in the pie chart, with other types ending up on the other end of the spectrum.
The pie charts above illustrate the difference in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentages
of various types of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
in France in the years 1995 and 2005.

Generally
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
of gas and coal
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
saw
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
minimal rises between the two years.
However
, on one hand, nuclear and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
kinds of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
had considerable increases; on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
of petrol experienced a dramatic fall between 1995 and 2005.

In 1995, coal had the highest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
, standing at 29. 80%, with the runner-ups being gas (29. 63%) and petrol (29. 27%).
In contrast
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
kinds of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
had the lowest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
(4. 90%), with nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
falling short of this figure by about 1. 5%.

By 2005,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
figures had notable
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changes
. Coal and gas
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentages
barely
shifted between the two years (30. 93% and 30. 31%,
respectively
).
Similarly
, nuclear and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
types of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
saw
modest rises by 2005 (3. 7% and 4. 2%,
respectively
).
However
, petrol
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
went through a substantial drop of approximately 9. 75% down to 19. 55%. Despite these fluctuations, coal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
figures remained the highest depicted in the pie chart, with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
types ending up on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
of the spectrum.

IELTS academic The pie chart below show the engergy production in French from 1995 to 2005.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
204 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The pie chart below show the engergy production in French from 1995 to 2005.