Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

the line graph below shows the consumption of four kinds of meat in a European Country from 1979 to 2004. v.2

the line graph below shows the consumption of four kinds of meat in a European Country from 1979 to 2004. v. 2
The line graph compares the various types of meat, namely chicken, beef, lamb and fish consumed per week in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Overall, it can be seen that, beef and lamb followed a fairly similar patterns. Both followed a downward trend, however, chicken consumption showed an upward trend. Although chicken initially had a lower rate of consumption as compared to beef and lamb, it exceeded the rest at the end of the period. Fish, on the other hand, had almost no change in its intake. During the start of the period, the grams of beef consumed per week stood at a little above 200, being the highest of that year, followed by lamb and chicken consumption, which was around 60 grams less than that, while that of fish remained the least, at a little above 50. Chicken consumption followed a gradual growth throughout. However, beef consumption on the other hand, despite some fluctuations, saw a steady decline. Subsequently, after 1989, the rising rate of chicken consumption outnumbered it. Hence, it finished a period with a low consumption rate of around 100 grams per person per week, followed by lamb, which stood at a little above 50, and then fish, which remained the least consumed one. Contrary to this, chicken became most preferred form of meat by the year 2004 and accounted for a weekly consumption of over 250 grams by the end of the timeframe.
The line graph compares the various types of meat,
namely
chicken,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
beef
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lamb
and fish consumed per week in a European country between 1979 and 2004.

Overall
, it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
beef
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lamb
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
followed
a
fairly
similar patterns. Both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
followed
a downward trend,
however
, chicken
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
showed
an upward trend. Although chicken
initially
had a lower rate of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
as compared to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
beef
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lamb
, it exceeded the rest at the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
of the period. Fish,
on the other hand
, had almost no
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
in its intake.

During the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
of the period, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
beef
consumed per week stood at a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
above 200, being the highest of that year,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
followed
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lamb
and chicken
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
, which was around 60
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
less than that, while that of fish remained the least, at a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
above 50.

Chicken
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
followed
a gradual growth throughout.
However
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
beef
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
on the other hand
, despite
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
fluctuations,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
saw
a steady decline.
Subsequently
, after 1989, the rising rate of chicken
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
outnumbered it.
Hence
, it finished a period with a low
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
rate of around 100
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
per person per week,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
followed
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lamb
, which stood at a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
little
above 50, and then fish, which remained the least consumed one. Contrary to this, chicken became most preferred form of meat by the year 2004 and accounted for a weekly
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
of over 250
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
by the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
of the timeframe.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
27Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes

IELTS academic the line graph below shows the consumption of four kinds of meat in a European Country from 1979 to 2004. v. 2

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
239 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts