The line graph illustrates the proportion of staff training offered by four distinct companies in the period from 2003 to 2006. Overall, all figures had an upward trend, trained staff in company B, C, D experienced significant change whereas those in company A just changed little.
The percentage of staff trained by company D decreased steadily then reached a low of around 13% in 2004, which was followed by a substantially growth in 2006 that achieved a treble rate at 35%. The quantity of company B and C both fluctuated throughout the years but by different level, the former is slight and the latter is considerable. Beside, the rate of staff training by company A saw a gradually decline to 25% in 2005 but later rised slowly to over 27% in 2006.
In general, the diagram indicates complicated trends of the figure of staff trained by four companies during times also finally, they all reached a great rate.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of
staff
training offered by four distinct
companies
in the period from 2003 to 2006.
Overall
, all figures had an upward trend, trained
staff
in
company
B, C, D experienced significant
change
whereas those in
company
A
just
changed
little
.
The percentage of
staff
trained by
company
D decreased
steadily
then reached a low of around 13% in 2004, which
was followed
by a
substantially growth
in 2006 that achieved a treble rate at 35%. The quantity of
company
B and C both fluctuated throughout the years
but
by
different
level, the former is slight and the latter is considerable. Beside, the rate of
staff
training by
company
A
saw
a
gradually decline
to 25% in 2005
but
later
rised
slowly
to over 27% in 2006.
In general
, the diagram indicates complicated trends of the figure of
staff
trained by four
companies
during times
also
finally
, they all reached a great rate.