The graph presents statistics of amount of discounts in the 2009 year. Mainly, the costs of purchases rose, however figure B shows the opposite. The commodity A is the most changed over the given period. Its price soared from approximately zero to about six thousand dollars. Another figure that shows large increase is product C. The expence had been equal to ten thousands dollars, afterwards that number was grown by more than fifty thousands. Unlike, the product B demonstrates a marked fall. Despite the fact that price of a good was the highest in January, this number was gradually decreased in twelve months period. Moreover, cost of the item reached almost the lowest level in December. Nevertheless, the least number at the end of 2009 was achieved by product D. Its price flactuated, but in the October the number finally leveled off. If the rest of the goods showed significant changes, this figure was modified clearly less than others did.
The graph presents statistics of amount of discounts in the 2009 year.
Mainly
, the costs of
purchases
rose,
however
figure B
shows
the opposite. The commodity A is the most
changed
over the
given
period. Its price soared from approximately zero to about six thousand dollars. Another figure that
shows
large increase is product C. The
expence
had been equal to ten thousands dollars, afterwards that
number
was grown
by more than fifty thousands. Unlike, the product B demonstrates a marked fall. Despite the fact that price of a
good
was the highest in January, this
number
was
gradually
decreased in twelve months period.
Moreover
, cost of the item reached almost the lowest level in December.
Nevertheless
, the least
number
at the
end
of 2009
was achieved
by product D. Its price
flactuated
,
but
in the October the
number
finally
leveled off. If the rest of the
goods
showed
significant
changes
, this figure
was modified
clearly
less than others did.