The graph compares four countries, namely Australia, Sweden, Iceland and Turkey, in terms of renewable energy contributed to total energy supply over a period of thirteen years, during 1997 and 2010.
Overall, Sweden and Iceland experienced/witnessed an upward trend in three examined years. It can be clearly seen that this type of energy was most ubiquitous/ stood out/ be the dominant in Iceland.
In 1997, nearly a half of energy in Iceland came from natural resources, which continued a ten-percent climb in 2000 and reached a peak at 70% in the next decade. Meanwhile, only approximately 5% of the entire amount of energy produced was generated from natural resources in Sweden, who experienced a similar trend to that of Iceland in regards to the proportion of renewable energy produced.
Regarding Australia, the energy supply from nature possessed 9% in 1997 and the figure showed a decline around 5% in 2000 and 3% in 2010. Similarly, Turkey decreased from 37% in 1997 down to 35% in 2010.
The graph compares four countries,
namely
Australia, Sweden, Iceland and Turkey, in terms of renewable
energy
contributed to total
energy
supply over a period of thirteen years, during 1997 and 2010.
Overall
, Sweden and Iceland experienced/witnessed an upward trend in three examined years. It can be
clearly
seen
that this type of
energy
was most ubiquitous/ stood out/ be the dominant in Iceland.
In 1997,
nearly
a half of
energy
in Iceland came from natural resources, which continued a ten-percent climb in 2000 and reached a peak at 70% in the
next
decade. Meanwhile,
only
approximately 5% of the entire amount of
energy
produced
was generated
from natural resources in Sweden, who experienced a similar trend to that of Iceland
in regards to
the proportion of renewable
energy
produced.
Regarding Australia, the
energy
supply from nature possessed 9% in 1997 and the figure
showed
a decline around 5% in 2000 and 3% in 2010.
Similarly
, Turkey decreased from 37% in 1997 down to 35% in 2010.