Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The graph below shows the percentages of different types of housholds waste recycled in a city between 1992 and 2002.

The graph below shows the percentages of different types of housholds waste recycled in a city between 1992 and 2002. w7VXE
The given infographic representation, in the form of column chart, reveals the proportion of recycled waste generated from houses of one city during 1992 to 2002. Overall, it can be noticed from the give graph that waste glass was the dominant for recycling in all given years. However, plastic was the least remanufactured from all given categories of waste. Besides that the ratio of recycling wastes such as plastic, cans, papers and glass has been significantly grown over the years. To be more precise, in 1992, 10% of the total plastic waste recycled, but this number slightly increased by 4% in 1997 and 2002. Following this, cans were reproduced by the proportion of around quarter in 1992, which fall down in 1997, and again grew up with approximately 10% and 20% respectively. However, the graph of paper and glass was exponential where over 10% of paper was regenerated in initial year which increased noticeably in 1997(18%) and 2002(30%). This same pattern was observed in recycling of glass, but in last year it escalated dramatically from one third of total to the half. These percentages was the highest among other waste generated from household in the city.
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
infographic representation, in the form of column chart, reveals the proportion of recycled
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
generated from
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
houses
of one city during 1992 to 2002.

Overall
, it can
be noticed
from the give graph that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
glass
was the dominant for recycling in all
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
years.
However
, plastic was the least
Possible spelling mistake found.
remanufactured
from all
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
categories of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
.
Besides
that the ratio of recycling
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wastes
such as plastic, cans, papers and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
glass
has been
significantly
grown over the years.

To be more precise, in 1992, 10% of the total plastic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
recycled,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
this number
slightly
increased by 4% in 1997 and 2002. Following this, cans
were reproduced
by the proportion of around quarter in 1992, which fall down in 1997, and again grew up with approximately 10% and 20%
respectively
.
However
, the graph of paper and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
glass
was exponential where over 10% of paper
was regenerated
in initial year which increased
noticeably
in 1997(18%) and 2002(30%). This same pattern
was observed
in recycling of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
glass
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
in last year it escalated
dramatically
from one third of total to the half. These percentages
You should probably use: "were".
was
the highest among other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
generated from household in the city.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The graph below shows the percentages of different types of housholds waste recycled in a city between 1992 and 2002.

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
196 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The graph below shows the percentages of different types of housholds waste recycled in a city between 1992 and 2002.