The given infographic representation, in the form of column chart, reveals the proportion of recycled waste generated from houses of one city during 1992 to 2002.
Overall, it can be noticed from the give graph that waste glass was the dominant for recycling in all given years. However, plastic was the least remanufactured from all given categories of waste. Besides that the ratio of recycling wastes such as plastic, cans, papers and glass has been significantly grown over the years.
To be more precise, in 1992, 10% of the total plastic waste recycled, but this number slightly increased by 4% in 1997 and 2002. Following this, cans were reproduced by the proportion of around quarter in 1992, which fall down in 1997, and again grew up with approximately 10% and 20% respectively. However, the graph of paper and glass was exponential where over 10% of paper was regenerated in initial year which increased noticeably in 1997(18%) and 2002(30%). This same pattern was observed in recycling of glass, but in last year it escalated dramatically from one third of total to the half. These percentages was the highest among other waste generated from household in the city. 
The  
given
 infographic representation, in the form of column chart, reveals the proportion of recycled  
waste
 generated from  
houses
 of one city during 1992 to 2002. 
Overall
, it can  
be noticed
 from the give graph that  
waste
  glass
 was the dominant for recycling in all  
given
 years.  
However
, plastic was the least  
remanufactured
 from all  
given
 categories of  
waste
.  
Besides
 that the ratio of recycling  
wastes
 such as plastic, cans, papers and  
glass
 has been  
significantly
 grown over the years.
To be more precise, in 1992, 10% of the total plastic  
waste
 recycled,  
but
 this number  
slightly
 increased by 4% in 1997 and 2002. Following this, cans  
were reproduced
 by the proportion of around quarter in 1992, which fall down in 1997, and again grew up with approximately 10% and 20%  
respectively
.  
However
, the graph of paper and  
glass
 was exponential where over 10% of paper  
was regenerated
 in initial year which increased  
noticeably
 in 1997(18%) and 2002(30%). This same pattern  
was observed
 in recycling of  
glass
,  
but
 in last year it escalated  
dramatically
 from one third of total to the half. These percentages  
was
 the highest among other  
waste
 generated from household in the city.