Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The chat show the percentage of sources in country during 1985 to 2003.

The chat show the percentage of sources in country during 1985 to 2003. 3WaoX

The proportion of power consumed by various sources which depicted in pie chart. During the time period of 1985 to 2003. The data has been given in percentages. As regards Natural gas, setting of at 13% in 1985 and escalation by 10% in 2003. As far as Hydrogen, which was almost remain stable 4% in 1985 to 2003. Moreover, the ratio of Nuclear gases witnessed at 17% prior to declined of 5% in 1995. While, the percentage of Others gas showed at 4% in 2003 after fall down 3%in 1985. consequently far as Oil, although it was 52% in 1985 on the contrary decreased by 11% in 2003. Overall, it is lucid that only Natural gases went up to others but Hydrogen was same in given periodThe proportion of power consumed by various sources which depicted in pie chart. During the time period of 1985 to 2003. The data has been given in percentages. As regards Natural gas, setting of at 13% in 1985 and escalation by 10% in 2003. As far as Hydrogen, which was almost remain stable 4% in 1985 to 2003. Moreover, the ratio of Nuclear gases witnessed at 17% prior to declined of 5% in 1995. While, the percentage of Others gas showed at 4% in 2003 after fall down 3%in 1985. consequently far as Oil, although it was 52% in 1985 on the contrary decreased by 11% in 2003. Overall, it is lucid that only Natural gases went up to others but Hydrogen was same in given period

The proportion of power consumed by various sources which depicted in pie chart. During the time period of 1985 to 2003. The data has been This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
 in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percentages
. As regards You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinnatelogicallegitimatereasonableinstinctiveordinary
Natural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvaporsmoke
gas
, setting of at 13% in 1985 and escalation by 10% in 2003. As You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdistantdeeplong
far
 as Hydrogen, which was almost remain stable 4% in 1985 to 2003. Moreover
, the ratio of Nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvaporsmoke
gases
 witnessed at 17% prior to declined of 5% in 1995. While, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percentage
 of Others You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvaporsmoke
gas
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstratedportrayedindicateddisplayed
showed
 at 4% in 2003 after fall down 3%in 1985. Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?consequently,
consequently
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdistantdeeplong
far
 as Oil, although it was 52% in 1985 on the contrary
 decreased by 11% in 2003. Overall
, it is lucid that This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinnatelogicallegitimatereasonableinstinctiveordinary
Natural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvaporsmoke
gases
 went up to others This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 Hydrogen was same in This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
Possible spelling mistake found.periodperiodsperiodicperianthperianths
periodThe
 proportion of power consumed by various sources which depicted in pie chart. During the time period of 1985 to 2003. The data has been This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
 in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percentages
. As regards You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinnatelogicallegitimatereasonableinstinctiveordinary
Natural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvaporsmoke
gas
, setting of at 13% in 1985 and escalation by 10% in 2003. As You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdistantdeeplong
far
 as Hydrogen, which was almost remain stable 4% in 1985 to 2003. Moreover
, the ratio of Nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvaporsmoke
gases
 witnessed at 17% prior to declined of 5% in 1995. While, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percentage
 of Others You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvaporsmoke
gas
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstratedportrayedindicateddisplayed
showed
 at 4% in 2003 after fall down 3%in 1985. Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?consequently,
consequently
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdistantdeeplong
far
 as Oil, although it was 52% in 1985 on the contrary
 decreased by 11% in 2003. Overall
, it is lucid that This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinnatelogicallegitimatereasonableinstinctiveordinary
Natural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvaporsmoke
gases
 went up to others This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 Hydrogen was same in This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
 period