The charts illustrate the total quantity of visitors as well as their satisfaction levels regarding the facilities of Ashdown Museum prior to and following improvements.
Overall, it can be seen that the number of visitors increased after the museum had been refurbished. Moreover, the level of satisfaction rose significantly as three out of four visitors rated the museum very satisfactory or satisfactory in the survey.
Prior to refurbishment, 74, 000 paid a visit to Ashdown Museum in a year and this number grew by 18, 000 the year after it had been refurbished.
With regards to the outcomes of the survey, before refurbishment, less than half the visitors gave positive ratings to the facilities in the museum. In fact, only 15% were very satisfied and 30% were just satisfied. However, after the improvements had been done, more than a third of visitors gave the museum a “very satisfied” rating, while those who felt satisfied made up 40%.
In contrast, in the year before the refurbishment, two fifths of the people who took part in the survey were dissatisfied, but this figure dipped to 15% only. Those who were very dissatisfied also halved in proportion (5%). In both years 5% of the visitors gave no response.
The charts illustrate the total quantity of
visitors
as well
as their satisfaction levels regarding the facilities of
Ashdown
Museum
prior to and following improvements.
Overall
, it can be
seen
that the number of
visitors
increased after the
museum
had
been refurbished
.
Moreover
, the level of satisfaction rose
significantly
as three out of four
visitors
rated the
museum
very
satisfactory or satisfactory in the survey.
Prior to refurbishment, 74, 000 paid a visit to
Ashdown
Museum
in a
year
and this number grew by 18, 000 the
year
after it had
been refurbished
.
With regards to
the outcomes of the survey,
before
refurbishment, less than half the
visitors
gave
positive
ratings to the facilities in the
museum
. In fact,
only
15% were
very
satisfied
and 30% were
just
satisfied
.
However
, after the improvements had
been done
, more than a third of
visitors
gave the
museum
a “
very
satisfied”
rating, while those who felt
satisfied
made up 40%.
In contrast
, in the
year
before
the refurbishment, two fifths of the
people
who
took part
in the survey
were dissatisfied
,
but
this figure dipped to 15%
only
. Those who were
very
dissatisfied
also
halved in proportion (5%). In both years 5% of the
visitors
gave no response.