Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

the charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co=workers

the charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co=workers 26o6A
The pie charts below demonstrate the results of examines about people relationships with their supervisors and co-workers in both years 2005 and 2009. According to the people relationship with their supervisors, most people rated very good and good in 20005, within 61 percent rated very good and 26 percent rated good. On the other hand, there are a few workers rated poor, do not have an answer, or do not have a supervisor. In 2009, a very good figure slightly rose to 65 percent while good figure sharply falling down from 26 to 22 percent. Besides, other categories were marginally changing and almost the same with 2005. Concerning relationships with co-workers, again most people in both years said the relationships were either good or very good, the figure for very good gradually increasing from 63 to 70 percent in 2009. The category for people said fair were rapidly diving down from 7 to 3 percent. In 2009, nobody said that their relationships with colleagues were poor. Consequently, everyone was happy with their relationships at work. To sum up, most workers tend to have very good or good relationships with their supervisors and colleagues at work in both years 2005 and 2009. In general, the percentages were stable and the difference was not great. Otherwise, both categories of workers saying relationships were good or very good rose a bit.
The pie charts below demonstrate the results of examines about
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
relationships
with their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
supervisors
and co-workers in both years 2005 and 2009.

According to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
relationship
with their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
supervisors
, most
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rated
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
in 20005, within 61
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rated
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
and 26
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rated
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
.
On the other hand
, there are a few workers
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rated
poor, do not have an answer, or do not have a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
supervisor
. In 2009, a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
figure
slightly
rose to 65
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
while
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
figure
sharply
falling down from 26 to 22
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
.
Besides
, other categories were
marginally
changing and almost the same with 2005.

Concerning
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
relationships
with co-workers, again most
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
in both years said the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
relationships
were either
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
or
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
, the figure for
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
gradually
increasing from 63 to 70
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
in 2009. The category for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
said
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
fair
were
rapidly
This phrase might be redundant. Consider using "diving".
diving down
from 7 to 3
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percent
. In 2009, nobody said that their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
relationships
with colleagues were poor.
Consequently
, everyone was happy with their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
relationships
at work.

To sum up, most workers tend to have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
relationships
with their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
supervisors
and colleagues at work in both years 2005 and 2009.
In general
, the percentages were stable and the difference was not great.
Otherwise
, both categories of workers saying
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
relationships
were
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
or
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
rose a bit.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic the charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co=workers

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
228 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts
  • 5.5band
    The given flowchart shows the consequences of deforestation.
    The given flow chart provides the information about what are the repercussion after cutting trees on Environment. It is crystal clear that during the process of deforestation heavy equipments and Gadgets compress the soil in way outcomely, land harder and baked. Furthermore, which leads to rainwater...
  • 6band
    BAR andline graph representing temperatute and rainfall in london
    The bar and line graph demonstrates the data on average rainfall as well as the maximum and minimum daily temperature in London over a year. Overall, it is evident from the graph that the maximum amount of rainfall during the month of November and the temperature in London never goes beyond a certa...
  • 6band
    The diagram details the life cycle of a pine tree (sporophyte).
    The diagram details the life cycle of a pine tree (sporophyte). Overall, there are several stages in the cycle, including the combination of various components of the tree’s pinecones and the combined cell’s growth. At first, the pine tree is guaranteed to give out 2 types of cone-related cells tha...
  • 6.5band
    The pie charts show the energy production in France by fuel sources oil, hydro power, nuclear, coal in 1990 and 2020.
    Five different types of energy production in France are represented in the two pie charts above, one from 1990 and other from 2010. Over the past two decades, France's use of Nuclear Power for electricity generation has increased significantly, while it is use of Natural gas has decreased dramatical...
  • 6.5band
    Rockingham, Transportation
    The pie charts show the ways workers in Rockingham normally traveled to work in 2005 and 2015. Overall, the biggest and clearest change in the table is a sharp decline in the number of people in Rockingham driving car alone to work, while other forms of transport increased slightly or stayed the sam...
  • 7band
    The Given Graph Shows The Main Sources of Energy in the USA in 1980 to 1990
    The chart depicts the major sources of five varieties of energy from two different years, 1980 to 1990, in the USA. It is calculated in percentage. In 1980, it can be seen that coal and hydroelectric power are both the lowest point of supply with only 5%. In contrast to oil, which the amount of ene...