The line graph illustrates the unemployment rate during the period of 2012. Overall, the percentage between rural areas and urban areas shows a significant difference at the beginning of the year, then the graph shows another rapid movement in the third quarter of the year and ends with a similar ratio.
Looking at the graph more closely, the two graphs are showing opposite moving trends throughout the year. The unemployment rate of rural areas was about three times greater than urban areas approximately 6. 5% and 2% respectively. But then, the figure for rural areas was decreasing at 4. 5%, while urban areas increased at 4%.
Furthermore, the graph shows another large gap between rural and urban areas in the third quarter of the year. The rural areas tend to rose slightly compared to urban areas at 5. 5%, however, urban areas dipped notably at 2%, which is similar to the starting point. Afterwards, urban areas went up again maintaining a similar number to rural areas at the end of the research period.
The line
graph
illustrates the unemployment rate during the period of 2012.
Overall
, the percentage between
rural
areas
and
urban
areas
shows
a significant difference at the beginning of the
year
, then the
graph
shows
another rapid movement in the third quarter of the
year
and ends with a similar ratio.
Looking at the
graph
more
closely
, the two
graphs
are showing opposite moving trends throughout the
year
. The unemployment rate of
rural
areas
was about three times greater than
urban
areas
approximately 6. 5% and 2%
respectively
.
But
then, the figure for
rural
areas
was decreasing at 4. 5%, while
urban
areas
increased at 4%.
Furthermore
, the
graph
shows
another large gap between
rural
and
urban
areas
in the third quarter of the
year
. The
rural
areas
tend to rose
slightly
compared to
urban
areas
at 5. 5%,
however
,
urban
areas
dipped
notably
at 2%, which is similar to the starting point. Afterwards,
urban
areas
went up again maintaining a similar number to
rural
areas
at the
end
of the research period.