The line chart given compares the proportion of people under 18 who seized in three areas, namely suburban, rural and urban between 1995 and 1998.
Overall, the figure for criminals decreased in each area over the period shown. Suburban areas had a period of instability while urban witnessed a through for crime arrest.
Based on the statistics, crimes in suburban areas stood at 2% in 1995, whereas almost 1% and 2% of urban and rural areas teenagers committed crimes. Over the next year these, numbers had drastic changes. For example, suburban areas reached a peak with 8% then dramatically fell to just nearly -2% in 1997, while the trend of rural and urban areas dropped simultaneously.
The line chart
given
compares the proportion of
people
under 18 who seized in three
areas
,
namely
suburban
, rural and
urban
between 1995 and 1998.
Overall
, the figure for criminals decreased in each
area
over the period shown.
Suburban
areas
had a period of instability while
urban
witnessed a through for crime arrest.
Based on the statistics, crimes in
suburban
areas
stood at 2% in 1995, whereas almost 1% and 2% of
urban
and rural
areas
teenagers
committed crimes. Over the
next
year these, numbers had drastic
changes
.
For example
,
suburban
areas
reached a peak with 8% then
dramatically
fell to
just
nearly
-2% in 1997, while the trend of rural and
urban
areas
dropped
simultaneously
.