The information regarding the proportion of the energy, which was produced by various sources in a specific nation from 1985 to 2003 is depicted By the assigned pie charts.
Overall, it can immensely clear that the minimum energy was generated from other renewavailable sources while the energy was generated from oil emerged as a leader in the given period.
Looking at the graph in more details, the biggest chunk was notched by oil, from where 52% and 39% energy was produced in 1985 and 2003, respectively. Whereas, other renewable resources produced minimum energy, which hurved between 1% and 5%. By contrast, the same energy was generated from nuclear, accounted for 4%.
Moving towards the rest of information, the production of energy from nuclear gas stood at 13% in the initial year, almost after a decade, it dwindled by 23%. As regards to the coal and nuclear, energy produced 8% and 22% during 1985, orderly but the production of energy from coal increased and from nuclear declined to 5%, each.
The information regarding the proportion of the
energy
, which was
produced
by various sources in a specific nation from 1985 to 2003
is depicted
By the assigned pie charts.
Overall
, it can
immensely
clear
that the minimum
energy
was generated
from other
renewavailable
sources while the
energy
was generated
from oil emerged as a leader in the
given
period.
Looking at the graph in more
details
, the biggest chunk
was notched
by oil, from where 52% and 39%
energy
was
produced
in 1985 and 2003,
respectively
. Whereas, other renewable resources
produced
minimum
energy
, which
hurved
between 1% and 5%. By contrast, the same
energy
was generated
from nuclear, accounted for 4%.
Moving towards the rest of information, the production of
energy
from nuclear gas stood at 13% in the initial year, almost after a decade, it dwindled by 23%. As regards to the coal and nuclear,
energy
produced
8% and 22% during 1985, orderly
but
the production of
energy
from coal increased and from nuclear declined to 5%, each.