The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005.
The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. RL0M
The pie charts compare the proportion of energy production from the five different sources in France for the years 1995 and 2005.
It is clear that the percentage of energy produced from coal, gas, nuclear and other sources increased, the reverse was true for petrol over the period shown. Additionally, coal and gas were the two most means of energy production in this country during the research period.
In 1995, coal was the primary energy source in France, with the figure registering nearly 30%. In contrast, gas and petrol used to create 26. 63% and 29. 27% of the total energy, respectively. In contrast, only 4. 9% of the total energy generated from other sources compared with 6. 4% by nuclear power.
In 2005, the proportion of energy generated from gas and coal rose dramatically to 30. 31% and 30. 39%, respectively. Meanwhile, there was a considerable increase in the figures for nuclear and other sources to 10. 10% and 9. 10%, respectively. By contrast, much less amount of energy generated from petrol as illustrated by a dramatic fall of nearly 10% to 19. 55%
The pie charts compare the proportion of
energy
production from the five
different
sources
in France for the years 1995 and 2005.
It is
clear
that the percentage of
energy
produced from coal,
gas
, nuclear and other
sources
increased, the reverse was true for petrol over the period shown.
Additionally
, coal and
gas
were the two most means of
energy
production in this country during the research period.
In 1995, coal was the primary
energy
source
in France, with the figure registering
nearly
30%.
In contrast
,
gas
and petrol
used
to create 26. 63% and 29. 27% of the total
energy
,
respectively
.
In contrast
,
only
4. 9% of the total
energy
generated from other
sources
compared with 6. 4% by nuclear power.
In 2005, the proportion of
energy
generated from
gas
and coal rose
dramatically
to 30. 31% and 30. 39%,
respectively
. Meanwhile, there was a considerable increase in the figures for nuclear and other
sources
to 10. 10% and 9. 10%,
respectively
. By contrast, much less amount of
energy
generated from petrol as illustrated by a dramatic fall of
nearly
10% to 19. 55%